Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528414›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Migration in the social stage of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae impacts competition.

Chandra N Jack, Neil Buttery, Boahemaa Adu-Oppong, Michael Powers, Christopher R L Thompson, David C Queller, Joan E Strassmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A single mutation inCommunications biology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chandra N JackDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI , United States of America.
Neil ButteryDepartment of Biology, Washington University , St. Louis , United States of America.
Boahemaa Adu-OppongDepartment of Biology, Washington University , St. Louis , United States of America.
Michael PowersDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University , Houston , United States of America.
Christopher R L ThompsonFaculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester , Manchester , United Kingdom.
David C QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington University , St. Louis , United States of America.
Joan E StrassmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University , St. Louis , United States of America.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M007146/1Wellcome Trust 095643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction conditions can change the balance of cooperation and conflict in multicellular groups. After aggregating together, cells of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum may migrate as a group (known as a slug) to a new location. We consider this migration stage as an arena for social competition and conflict because the cells in the slug may not be from a genetically homogeneous population. In this study, we examined the interplay of two seemingly diametric actions, the solitary action of kin recognition and the collective action of slug migration in D. discoideum, to more fully understand the effects of social competition on fitness over the entire lifecycle. We compare slugs composed of either genetically homogenous or heterogeneous cells that have migrated or remained stationary in the social stage of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. After migration of chimeric slugs, we found that facultative cheating is reduced, where facultative cheating is defined as greater contribution to spore relative to stalk than found for that clone in the clonal state. In addition our results support previous findings that competitive interactions in chimeras diminish slug migration distance. Furthermore, fruiting bodies have shorter stalks after migration, even accounting for cell numbers at that time. Taken together, these results show that migration can alleviate the conflict of interests in heterogeneous slugs. It aligns their interest in finding a more advantageous place for dispersal, where shorter stalks suffice, which leads to a decrease in cheating behavior.

Indexed as

CheatingChimerasCompetitionDictyostelium discoideumMigration

Identifiers

PMID26528414
PMCPMC4627915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.