Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528410›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) running the gauntlet: an evaluation of translocations into free-range environments in Namibia.

Florian J Weise, Joseph R Lemeris, Stuart J Munro, Andrew Bowden, Cicelia Venter, Marlice van Vuuren, Rudie J van Vuuren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. MakingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Communication hubs of an asocial cat are the source of a human-carnivore conflict and key to its solution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. The global decline of cheetah Acinonyx jubatus and what it means for conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian J WeiseResearch, N/a'an ku se Research Programme , Windhoek , Namibia ; School of Science and the Environment, Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology, The Manchester Metropolitan University , Manchester , United Kingdom.
Joseph R LemerisBig Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society , Washington District of Columbia , United States of America.
Stuart J MunroResearch, N/a'an ku se Research Programme , Windhoek , Namibia.
Andrew BowdenResearch, N/a'an ku se Research Programme , Windhoek , Namibia.
Cicelia VenterResearch, N/a'an ku se Research Programme , Windhoek , Namibia.
Marlice van VuurenDirectorate, N/a'an ku se Foundation , Windhoek , Namibia.
Rudie J van VuurenDirectorate, N/a'an ku se Foundation , Windhoek , Namibia.
Manchester Metropolitan University · GBNational Geographic Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following dramatic range and population declines, the cheetah is Africa's most endangered large felid. In Namibia, private land managers still trap cheetahs but increasingly consider moving animals instead of killing them. Across Africa, managers have translocated perceived conflict carnivores for decades, but rarely evaluated their actions. We analyse the outcomes of 15 cheetah translocations (for 23 adults and 10 dependent offspring) into free-range environments in Namibia. We released cheetahs at an average distance of 419.6 km ± 216.1 km SD (range: 71-816 km) after captive periods ranging from 1-1,184 days (350.6 days ± 439.0 days SD). An individual's ability to survive the first year predominantly determined the overall translocation success of 40%. Post-release conflict and homing had less impact on success. Cheetah survival was lowest in the first three months after release. Human persecution (50% of deaths) and spotted hyaenas (29% of deaths) had the highest effect on survival. The degree of habituation to humans acquired during captivity significantly influenced chances of survival. Cheetahs surviving the initial post-release period (∼90 days) often settled into ranges and females reproduced successfully. However, all individuals exhibited extensive movements, frequently roaming >4,000 km(2) in the first six months after release (with a maximum of 19,743 km(2) in 112 days), resulting in low release site fidelity. Soft release and larger recipient area size did not improve site fidelity. Based on these outcomes, we evaluated which unfenced conservation areas in Namibia could potentially receive cheetahs. We found that there are currently few public and/or private reserves large enough to contain the movement profiles we observed in this study. This suggests that most translocations will result in cheetahs re-entering farmlands where they face a high risk of persecution. In conclusion, translocations into unconfined areas can successfully conserve individual cheetahs. Due to high mortality and unpredictable outcomes, however, conservation efforts need to focus on improving tolerance of cheetahs in commercial livestock and game farming areas in order to reduce the number of indiscriminately trapped animals.

Indexed as

Acinonyx jubatusCheetahConflictManagementNamibiaRelocation

Identifiers

PMID26528410
PMCPMC4627913
OpenAlexW2097314090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.