Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528272›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Nonlinear temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetics explains canceling effect-a case study on loamy haplic Luvisol.

Bahar S Razavi, Evgenia Blagodatskaya, Yakov Kuzyakov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The influence of temperature on the metabolic activity of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 genetic variantsXenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transformation and fate of urea in pit-toilet blackwater after discharge to environment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bahar S RazaviDepartment of Agricultural Soil Science, University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Evgenia BlagodatskayaDepartment of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany ; Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problem in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Science Pushchino, Russia.
Yakov KuzyakovDepartment of Agricultural Soil Science, University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany ; Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEInstitute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temperature sensitivity of enzymes responsible for organic matter decomposition in soil is crucial for predicting the effects of global warming on the carbon cycle and sequestration. We tested the hypothesis that differences in temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetic parameters V max and K m will lead to a canceling effect: strong reduction of temperature response of catalytic reactions. Short-term temperature response of V max and K m of three hydrolytic enzymes responsible for decomposition of cellulose (β-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase) and hemicelluloses (xylanase) were analyzed in situ from 0 to 40°C. The apparent activation energy varied between enzymes from 20.7 to 35.2 kJ mol(-1) corresponding to the Q 10 values of the enzyme activities of 1.4-1.9 (with V max - Q 10 1.0-2.5 and K m - Q 10 0.94-2.3). Temperature response of all tested enzymes fitted well to the Arrhenius equation. Despite that, the fitting of Arrhenius model revealed the non-linear increase of two cellulolytic enzymes activities with two distinct thresholds at 10-15°C and 25-30°C, which were less pronounced for xylanase. The nonlinearity between 10 and 15°C was explained by 30-80% increase in V max . At 25-30°C, however, the abrupt decrease of enzyme-substrate affinity was responsible for non-linear increase of enzyme activities. Our study is the first demonstrating nonlinear response of V max and K m to temperature causing canceling effect, which was most strongly pronounced at low substrate concentrations and at temperatures above 15°C. Under cold climate, however, the regulation of hydrolytic activity by canceling in response to warming is negligible because canceling was never observed below 10°C. The canceling, therefore, can be considered as natural mechanism reducing the effects of global warming on decomposition of soil organics at moderate temperatures. The non-linearity of enzyme responses to warming and the respective thresholds should therefore be investigated for other enzymes, and incorporated into Earth system models to improve the predictions at regional and global levels.

Indexed as

activation energyArrhenius functioncanceling effectcarbon cycleMichaelis-Menten kineticssoil enzymestemperature sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID26528272
PMCPMC4604301
OpenAlexW2173403747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.