ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015
The influence of object shape and center of mass on grasp and gaze.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the duration of reach-to-grasp movements to objects with asymmetric contact surfaces.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Anticipation (second-order motor planning) is stored in memory - processing of grasp postures in a priming paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- A scoping review of eye tracking metrics used to assess visuomotor behaviours of upper limb prosthesis users.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Amodal completion and relationalism.Philosophical studies · 2022Article
- Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Predicting precision grip grasp locations on three-dimensional objects.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Gaze, visual, myoelectric, and inertial data of grasps for intelligent prosthetics.Scientific data · 2020Article
- Head-mounted eye gaze tracking devices: An overview of modern devices and recent advances.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
- Object Visibility, Not Energy Expenditure, Accounts For Spatial Biases in Human Grasp Selection.i-PerceptionArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent experiments examining where participants look when grasping an object found that fixations favor the eventual index finger landing position on the object. Even though the act of picking up an object must involve complex high-level computations such as the visual analysis of object contours, surface properties, knowledge of an object's function and center of mass (COM) location, these investigations have generally used simple symmetrical objects - where COM and horizontal midline overlap. Less research has been aimed at looking at how variations in object properties, such as differences in curvature and changes in COM location, affect visual and motor control. The purpose of this study was to examine grasp and fixation locations when grasping objects whose COM was positioned to the left or right of the objects horizontal midline (Experiment 1) and objects whose COM was moved progressively further from the midline of the objects based on the alteration of the object's shape (Experiment 2). Results from Experiment 1 showed that object COM position influenced fixation locations and grasp locations differently, with fixations not as tightly linked to index finger grasp locations as was previously reported with symmetrical objects. Fixation positions were also found to be more central on the non-symmetrical objects. This difference in gaze position may provide a more holistic view, which would allow both index finger and thumb positions to be monitored while grasping. Finally, manipulations of COM distance (Experiment 2) exerted marked effects on the visual analysis of the objects when compared to its influence on grasp locations, with fixation locations more sensitive to these manipulations. Together, these findings demonstrate how object features differentially influence gaze vs. grasp positions during object interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.