Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528190›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2015

Dental pulp stem cells as a multifaceted tool for bioengineering and the regeneration of craniomaxillofacial tissues.

Maitane Aurrekoetxea, Patricia Garcia-Gallastegui, Igor Irastorza, Jon Luzuriaga, Verónica Uribe-Etxebarria, Fernando Unda, Gaskon Ibarretxe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Identification of Active Components inMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Regenerative Capacity of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Injectable Biomaterials for Dental Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maitane AurrekoetxeaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Patricia Garcia-GallasteguiDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Igor IrastorzaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Jon LuzuriagaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Verónica Uribe-EtxebarriaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Fernando UndaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.
Gaskon IbarretxeDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental pulp stem cells, or DPSC, are neural crest-derived cells with an outstanding capacity to differentiate along multiple cell lineages of interest for cell therapy. In particular, highly efficient osteo/dentinogenic differentiation of DPSC can be achieved using simple in vitro protocols, making these cells a very attractive and promising tool for the future treatment of dental and periodontal diseases. Among craniomaxillofacial organs, the tooth and salivary gland are two such cases in which complete regeneration by tissue engineering using DPSC appears to be possible, as research over the last decade has made substantial progress in experimental models of partial or total regeneration of both organs, by cell recombination technology. Moreover, DPSC seem to be a particularly good choice for the regeneration of nerve tissues, including injured or transected cranial nerves. In this context, the oral cavity appears to be an excellent testing ground for new regenerative therapies using DPSC. However, many issues and challenges need yet to be addressed before these cells can be employed in clinical therapy. In this review, we point out some important aspects on the biology of DPSC with regard to their use for the reconstruction of different craniomaxillofacial tissues and organs, with special emphasis on cranial bones, nerves, teeth, and salivary glands. We suggest new ideas and strategies to fully exploit the capacities of DPSC for bioengineering of the aforementioned tissues.

Indexed as

bonecell therapydifferentiationDPSCnervesalivary glandtooth

Identifiers

PMID26528190
PMCPMC4607862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.