Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Estimating multivariate similarity between neuroimaging datasets with sparse canonical correlation analysis: an application to perfusion imaging.

Maria J Rosa, Mitul A Mehta, Emilio M Pich, Celine Risterucci, Fernando Zelaya, Antje A T S Reinders, Steve C R Williams, Paola Dazzan, Orla M Doyle, Andre F Marquand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria J RosaCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Mitul A MehtaCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Emilio M PichF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Basel, Switzerland.
Celine RisterucciF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Basel, Switzerland.
Fernando ZelayaCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Antje A T S ReindersDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Steve C R WilliamsCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Paola DazzanDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK ; National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, King's College London London, UK.
Orla M DoyleCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
Andre F MarquandCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK ; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
King's College London · GBRoche (Switzerland) · CHSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of neuroimaging studies are based on either combining more than one data modality (inter-modal) or combining more than one measurement from the same modality (intra-modal). To date, most intra-modal studies using multivariate statistics have focused on differences between datasets, for instance relying on classifiers to differentiate between effects in the data. However, to fully characterize these effects, multivariate methods able to measure similarities between datasets are needed. One classical technique for estimating the relationship between two datasets is canonical correlation analysis (CCA). However, in the context of high-dimensional data the application of CCA is extremely challenging. A recent extension of CCA, sparse CCA (SCCA), overcomes this limitation, by regularizing the model parameters while yielding a sparse solution. In this work, we modify SCCA with the aim of facilitating its application to high-dimensional neuroimaging data and finding meaningful multivariate image-to-image correspondences in intra-modal studies. In particular, we show how the optimal subset of variables can be estimated independently and we look at the information encoded in more than one set of SCCA transformations. We illustrate our framework using Arterial Spin Labeling data to investigate multivariate similarities between the effects of two antipsychotic drugs on cerebral blood flow.

Indexed as

antipsychoticsArterial Spin Labelingintra-modal datamultivariate analysispharmacological MRIrepeated measuresresting cerebral blood flowsparse canonical correlation analysis

Identifiers

PMID26528117
PMCPMC4603249
OpenAlexW1906197606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.