Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527945›Full record

ReviewClujul medical (1957)2013

The management of biofilm formation after hyaluronic acid gel filler injections: a review.

Dinu I Dumitraşcu, Alexandru V Georgescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clujul medical (1957), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Another face of dermal fillers.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dinu I DumitraşcuDept. of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandru V GeorgescuDept. of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimOne of the most popular procedures of facial fillers in recent years has become the use of hyaluronic acid (HA). However, this method may be associated with local side effects of different severity. Many of them are not due to allergies, as previously believed, but to the formation of biofilm. We review the current knowledge on biofilm after HA.

methodsAll pertinent full text papers retrieved from PubMed under search words: "biofilm", "hyaluronic acid", "dermal fillers", "hyaluronic acid complications" and "hyaluronic acid side effects" were analyzed; 29 of 60 articles were selected fro analysis.

resultsLocal infections were reported: 13 cases are attributable to the activation of the biofilm. Clinical evolution is generally mild. Therapy should avoid NSAID and is based on the administration of antibiotics, oral corticosteroids, or 5-Flourouracil. Removal of HA with hyaluronidase has also been proposed.

conclusionsThe use of HA in cosmetic procedures might be accompanied by local adverse effects attributable to biofilm formation. This usually has a mild evolution, but in special cases requires specific therapy.

Indexed as

biofilmcomplicationsfillershyaluronic acid

Identifiers

PMID26527945
PMCPMC4462513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.