Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527939›Full record

ArticleClujul medical (1957)2013

Case report of primary small cell neuroendocrine breast cancer.

Emil Puscas, Cosmin Lisencu, Ioana Neagoe

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clujul medical (1957), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emil PuscasDepartment of Oncological Oncology and Surgical Oncology, The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca, Romania ; Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cosmin LisencuDepartment of Oncological Oncology and Surgical Oncology, The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana NeagoeDepartment of Functional Genomics and Experimental Pathology, The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPrimary neuroendocrine cancer of the breast (NECB) is an extremely rare tumor. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized this category with three well-described subtypes: small cell, large cell, and carcinoid-like carcinoma; very few peer-review publications based on the WHO definition were encountered in the literature, and we conducted a literature search to investigate the reported incidence, diagnosis, prognosis, hormone receptor status, and treatment options for this rare tumor. Confirming the breast as an origin of neuroendocrine tumor represents a challenge. The diagnosis is mainly dependent on the exclusion of other extra-mammary organs based on clinical, radiological, and pathological data. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is rare - only about 30 cases have been reported in literature. Immunohistochemical examination showing expression of chromogranin and/or synaptophysin confirms evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation. Usually foci of neuroendocrine differentiation can be seen in breast carcinoma and are reported to be present in about 2-5% of breast cancer cases. Here, we report a case of breast carcinoma in which most of the areas studied on the tissue section showed neuroendocrine differentiation. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is a group that exhibits morphological features similar to those of neuroendocrine tumors of both the gastrointestinal tract and the lung. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 50-year-old Caucasian woman with primary small cell neuroendocrine cancer of the breast, which we characterized with immunohistochemical techniques. A palpable and mobile 3.0 cm tumor was located in the upper-outer quadrant of her right breast. After pathological confirmation the patient underwent 8 cycles of chemotherapy, and subsequent radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node resection were performed. Microscopically, the tumor consisted predominantly of a diffuse proliferation of small oat cells. The tumor cells were positive for neuroendocrine markers; 21 of 30 lymph nodes were metastatic. Local recurrence with multiple lung metastases developed only 5 weeks after surgery, despite of the transient tumor regression achieved by chemotherapy. This case reinforces the importance of an early correct diagnosis and the standardization of a treatment regimen for this very rare tumor. A correct treatment needs to be chosen.

Indexed as

breast cancerdisseminationprimary small cell neuroendocrine breast cancertreatment

Identifiers

PMID26527939
PMCPMC4462441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.