ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2015
Diagnosis of prostate cancer via nanotechnological approach.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the DNHD1‑HDAC6 axis inactivates prostate cancer cell aggressivenessOncology reports · 2026Article
- Emerging Trends of Nanomedicines in the Management of Prostate Cancer: Perspectives and Potential Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Biomolecule-functionalized nanoformulations for prostate cancer theranostics.Journal of advanced research · 2023Review
- Single-molecule amplification-free multiplexed detection of circulating microRNA cancer biomarkers from serum.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Nanotreatment and Nanodiagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Recent Updates.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Merging new-age biomarkers and nanodiagnostics for precision prostate cancer management.Nature reviews. Urology · 2019Review
- Potential applications and human biosafety of nanomaterials used in nanomedicine.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2018Review
- Epidermal Growth Factor-Containing Fibulin-Like Extracellular Matrix Protein 1 (EFEMP1) Acts as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Prostate Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
- Prostate Cancer Stem Cells and Nanotechnology: A Focus on Wnt Signaling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among the Caucasian adult males in Europe and the USA. Currently available diagnostic strategies for patients with prostate cancer are invasive and unpleasant and have poor accuracy. Many patients have been overly or underly treated resulting in a controversy regarding the reliability of current conventional diagnostic approaches. This review discusses the state-of-the-art research in the development of novel noninvasive prostate cancer diagnostics using nanotechnology coupled with suggested diagnostic strategies for their clinical implication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.