Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527835›Full record

ArticleHealth education journal2015

Health professionals' perspectives on exercise referral and physical activity promotion in primary care: Findings from a process evaluation of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales.

Nafees U Din, Graham F Moore, Simon Murphy, Clare Wilkinson, Nefyn H Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review of The Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Factors associated with programme completion and physical activity adherence in a community-based cancer exercise programme.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Critical perspectives on Arts on Prescription.Perspectives in public health · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nafees U DinNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Graham F MooreDECIPHer, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Simon MurphyDECIPHer, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Clare WilkinsonNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Nefyn H WilliamsNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Bangor University · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesReferring clinicians' experiences of exercise referral schemes (ERS) can provide valuable insights into their uptake. However, most qualitative studies focus on patient views only. This paper explores health professionals' perceptions of their role in promoting physical activity and experiences of a National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) in Wales.

designQualitative semi-structured group interviews.

settingGeneral practice premises.

methodsNine semi-structured group interviews involving 46 health professionals were conducted on general practice premises in six local health board areas. Purposive sampling taking into account area deprivation, practice size and referral rates was employed. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method of thematic analysis.

resultsHealth professionals described physical activity promotion as important, although many thought it was outside of their expertise and remit, and less important than other health promotion activities such as smoking cessation. Professionals linked decisions on whether to advise physical activity to patients to their own physical activity levels and to subjective judgements of patient motivation. While some described ERS as a holistic alternative to medication, with potential social benefits, others expressed concerns regarding their limited reach and potential to exacerbate inequalities. Barriers to referral included geographic isolation and uncertainties about patient selection criteria, medico-legal responsibilities and a lack of feedback about patient progress.

conclusionClinicians' concerns about expertise, priority setting and time constraints should be addressed to enhance physical activity promotion in primary care. Further research is needed to fully understand decision making relating to provision of physical activity advice and use of ERS.

Indexed as

Exercise referralhealth promotionphysical activityprimary health careprocess evaluationWales

Identifiers

PMID26527835
PMCPMC4604423
OpenAlexW2118868950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.