Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527824›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2016

Differences in obstetric care among nulliparous First Nations and non-First Nations women in British Columbia, Canada.

Corinne A Riddell, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Leanne S Dahlgren

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Postoperative outcomes for Indigenous Peoples in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Disparities in infant hospitalizations in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in Quebec, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corinne A RiddellDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health (Riddell), McGill University, Montréal, Qué.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Hutcheon, Dahlgren), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC corinne.riddell@mail.mcgill.ca.
Jennifer A HutcheonDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health (Riddell), McGill University, Montréal, Qué.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Hutcheon, Dahlgren), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Leanne S DahlgrenDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health (Riddell), McGill University, Montréal, Qué.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Hutcheon, Dahlgren), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
University of British Columbia · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research HOA-80072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada's Aboriginal population faces significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal and postnatal death than those seen in the general population. The objective of this study was to compare indicators of obstetric care quality and use of obstetric interventions between First Nations and non-First Nations mothers in British Columbia, Canada.

methodsWe linked obstetrical medical records with the First Nations Client File for all nulliparous women who delivered single infants in British Columbia from 1999 to 2011. Using logistic regression models, we examined differences in the proportion of women who received services aligned with best practice guidelines, as well as the overall use of obstetric interventions among First Nations mothers compared with the general population, controlling for geographic barriers (distance to hospital) and other relevant confounders.

resultsDuring the study period, 215,993 single births occurred in nulliparous women in British Columbia, 9152 of which were to members of our First Nations cohort. First Nations mothers were less likely to have early ultrasonography (adjusted risk difference = 10.2 fewer women per 100 deliveries [95% confidence interval {CI} -11.3 to -9.3]), to have at least 4 antenatal care visits (3.6 fewer women per 100 deliveries [95% CI -4.6 to -2.6]), and to undergo labour induction after prolonged (> 24 hours) prelabour rupture of membranes (-5.9 [95% CI -11.8 to 0.1]) or at post-dates gestation (-10.6 [95% CI -13.8 to -7.5]). Obstetric interventions including epidural, labour induction, instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery were used less often in First Nations mothers.

interpretationWe identified differences in the obstetric care received by First Nations mothers compared with the general population. Such differences warrant further investigation, given increases in perinatal mortality that are consistently shown and that may be a downstream consequence of differences in care.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanAdolescentAdultBritish ColumbiaDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsParityPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26527824
PMCPMC4732979
OpenAlexW2205568608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.