Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527721›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

PGSB PlantsDB: updates to the database framework for comparative plant genome research.

Manuel Spannagl, Thomas Nussbaumer, Kai C Bader, Mihaela M Martis, Michael Seidel, Karl G Kugler, Heidrun Gundlach, Klaus F X Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biological Insights and Recent Advances in Plant Long Non-Coding RNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Finding and Characterizing Repeats in Plant Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuel SpannaglPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany manuel.spannagl@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Thomas NussbaumerPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany Division of Computational Systems Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Kai C BaderPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Mihaela M MartisPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany BILS (Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Life Sciences), Division of Cell Biology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-558185 Linköping, Sweden.
Michael SeidelPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Karl G KuglerPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Heidrun GundlachPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Klaus F X MayerPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PGSB (Plant Genome and Systems Biology: formerly MIPS) PlantsDB (http://pgsb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/plant/index.jsp) is a database framework for the comparative analysis and visualization of plant genome data. The resource has been updated with new data sets and types as well as specialized tools and interfaces to address user demands for intuitive access to complex plant genome data. In its latest incarnation, we have re-worked both the layout and navigation structure and implemented new keyword search options and a new BLAST sequence search functionality. Actively involved in corresponding sequencing consortia, PlantsDB has dedicated special efforts to the integration and visualization of complex triticeae genome data, especially for barley, wheat and rye. We enhanced CrowsNest, a tool to visualize syntenic relationships between genomes, with data from the wheat sub-genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii and added functionality to the PGSB RNASeqExpressionBrowser. GenomeZipper results were integrated for the genomes of barley, rye, wheat and perennial ryegrass and interactive access is granted through PlantsDB interfaces. Data exchange and cross-linking between PlantsDB and other plant genome databases is stimulated by the transPLANT project (http://transplantdb.eu/).

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, PlantGene ExpressionGenomicsHordeumPlantsSecaleSoftwareTriticum

Identifiers

PMID26527721
PMCPMC4702821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.