Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527647›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2016

Reciprocal Regulation of l-Arabinose and d-Xylose Metabolism in Escherichia coli.

Santosh Koirala, Xiaoyi Wang, Christopher V Rao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. L-Arabinose Alters theMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ExaminingBiotechnology for biofuels · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Santosh KoiralaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Xiaoyi WangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Christopher V RaoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA cvrao@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGlucose is known to inhibit the transport and metabolism of many sugars in Escherichia coli. This mechanism leads to its preferential consumption. Far less is known about the preferential utilization of nonglucose sugars in E. coli. Two exceptions are l-arabinose and d-xylose. Previous studies have shown that l-arabinose inhibits d-xylose metabolism in Escherichia coli. This repression results from l-arabinose-bound AraC binding to the promoter of the d-xylose metabolic genes and inhibiting their expression. This mechanism, however, has not been explored in single cells. Both the l-arabinose and d-xylose utilization systems are known to exhibit a bimodal induction response to their cognate sugar, where mixed populations of cells either expressing the metabolic genes or not are observed at intermediate sugar concentrations. This suggests that l-arabinose can only inhibit d-xylose metabolism in l-arabinose-induced cells. To understand how cross talk between these systems affects their response, we investigated E. coli during growth on mixtures of l-arabinose and d-xylose at single-cell resolution. Our results showed that mixed, multimodal populations of l-arabinose- and d-xylose-induced cells occurred at intermediate sugar concentrations. We also found that d-xylose inhibited the expression of the l-arabinose metabolic genes and that this repression was due to XylR. These results demonstrate that a strict hierarchy does not exist between l-arabinose and d-xylose as previously thought. The results may also aid in the design of E. coli strains capable of simultaneous sugar consumption. IMPORTANCE: Glucose, d-xylose, and l-arabinose are the most abundant sugars in plant biomass. Developing efficient fermentation processes that convert these sugars into chemicals and fuels will require strains capable of coutilizing these sugars. Glucose has long been known to repress the expression of the l-arabinose and d-xylose metabolic genes in Escherichia coli. Recent studies found that l-arabinose also represses the expression of the d-xylose metabolic genes. In the present study, we found that d-xylose also represses the expression of the l-arabinose metabolic genes, leading to mixed populations of cells capable of utilizing l-arabinose and d-xylose. These results further our understanding of mixed-sugar utilization and may aid in strain design.

Indexed as

ArabinoseEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein BindingXyloseArabinoseXylose

Identifiers

PMID26527647
PMCPMC4719453
OpenAlexW2221739655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.