Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527577›Full record

ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2016

Harnessing natural product assembly lines: structure, promiscuity, and engineering.

Christopher C Ladner, Gavin J Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Discovery of the actinoplanic acid pathway inThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The secreted metabolome ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher C LadnerDepartment of Chemistry, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8204, USA.
Gavin J WilliamsDepartment of Chemistry, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8204, USA. gjwillia@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Synthetic Biology Approach to Regioselectively Modified PolyketidesR01GM104258 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI WILLIAMS, GAVIN J · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM104258-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many therapeutically relevant natural products are biosynthesized by the action of giant mega-enzyme assembly lines. By leveraging the specificity, promiscuity, and modularity of assembly lines, a variety of strategies has been developed that enables the biosynthesis of modified natural products. This review briefly summarizes recent structural advances related to natural product assembly lines, discusses chemical approaches to probing assembly line structures in the absence of traditional biophysical data, and surveys efforts that harness the inherent or engineered promiscuity of assembly lines for the synthesis of non-natural polyketides and non-ribosomal peptide analogues.

Indexed as

Metabolic EngineeringBiological ProductsBiosynthetic PathwaysPeptidesPolyketidesBiological ProductsPeptidesPolyketidesCombinatorial biosynthesisEnzyme engineeringNon-ribosomal peptide synthasesPolyketide synthasesSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID26527577
PMCPMC4753117
OpenAlexW1948568063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.