Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527161›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

Subtractive assembly for comparative metagenomics, and its application to type 2 diabetes metagenomes.

Mingjie Wang, Thomas G Doak, Yuzhen Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Locality-Sensitive Hashing-Based k-Mer Clustering for Identification of Differential Microbial Markers Related to Host Phenotype.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Graft-Derived Reconstitution of Mucosal-Associated Invariant T Cells after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2018
    Observational
  6. A concurrent subtractive assembly approach for identification of disease associated sub-metagenomes.Research in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- ) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingjie WangSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. wang51@indiana.edu.
Thomas G DoakDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. tdoak@indiana.edu.
Yuzhen YeSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. yye@indiana.edu.

Funding

Graph-centric approaches to metatranscriptomic and metaproteomic data analysisR01AI108888 · NIAID · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI YE, YUZHEN · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI108888-01A1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative metagenomics remains challenging due to the size and complexity of metagenomic datasets. Here we introduce subtractive assembly, a de novo assembly approach for comparative metagenomics that directly assembles only the differential reads that distinguish between two groups of metagenomes. Using simulated datasets, we show it improves both the efficiency of the assembly and the assembly quality of the differential genomes and genes. Further, its application to type 2 diabetes (T2D) metagenomic datasets reveals clear signatures of the T2D gut microbiome, revealing new phylogenetic and functional features of the gut microbial communities associated with T2D.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastrointestinal TractHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID26527161
PMCPMC4630832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.