Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26527031›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2016

Can tumor regression grade influence survival outcome in ypT3 rectal cancer?

L Shen, L Wang, G Li, H Zhang, L Liang, M Fan, Y Wu, W Deng, W Sheng, J Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
L WangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
G LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
H ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
L LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
M FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Y WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
W DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
W ShengDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
J ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Z ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. zhenzhang6@hotmail.com.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLocally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients achieving ypT3 status following neoadjuvant chemoradiation are considered to have poor response with minimal downstaging. However, residual cancer cell amounts vary in the subserosa/perirectal fat. Tumor regression grading (TRG) is an evaluation method based on the proportion of fibrosis and residual cancer cells. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of TRG in ypT3 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 325 LARC patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. TRG scores were recorded by two independent pathologists. Among these patients, 143 were staged as ypT3. We analyzed TRG and other clinicopathological factors and their relationship with survival outcome including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsAmong 143 ypT3 patients, 44 (30.8 %) were TRG1, 84 (58.7 %) were TRG2 and 15 (10.5 %) were TRG3. Seventy-nine (55.3 %) of these patients had metastatic lymph nodes. In univariate analysis, TRG was not associated with DFS (TRG2 vs TRG1, P = 0.852; TRG3 vs TRG1, P = 0.593) or OS (TRG2 vs TRG1, P = 0.977; TRG3 vs TRG1, P = 0.665). Palliative surgery (HR 3.845; 95 % CI 1.670-8.857; P = 0.002) and metastatic lymph nodes after surgery (HR 5.894; 95 % CI 1.142-3.48; P = 0.015) were significantly associated with decreased DFS, while palliative surgery was the only factor associated with worse OS (HR 6.011; 95 % CI 2.150-16.810; P = 0.001). Palliative surgery (HR 3.923; 95 % CI 1.696-9.073; P = 0.001) and metastatic lymph nodes (HR 2.011; 95 % CI 1.152-3.512; P = 0.014) also showed prognostic significance for DFS in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsResidual cancer cells evaluated by TRG score after neoadjuvant chemoradiation do not influence survival outcome in ypT3 rectal cancer patients. However, lymph node status is a significant prognostic factor in ypT3 patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeRectal cancerTumor regression grade (TRG)ypT3

Identifiers

PMID26527031
OpenAlexW2151091901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.