ReviewDer Orthopade2015
[Epidemiology and prevention of prosthetic joint infection].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial peptides in human synovial membrane as (low-grade) periprosthetic joint infection biomarkers.European journal of medical research · 2020Trial
- [Bone cement as a local antibiotic carrier].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Periprosthetic infection after total hip replacement : Risk factors for an early infection after primary implantation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2019Article
- [Surgery of sepsis in orthopedics and trauma - A highlight : Current survey by the section for bone and soft tissue infections of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProsthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging for patients and orthopedic surgeons and represents a great economic burden to the health care system. The growing number of primary and revision arthroplasty procedures in an aging society with demographic changes will increase the number of PJIs in the future.
aimThis article presents an overview of the epidemiology and prevention of PJI.
methodA selective literature review was performed focusing on evidence-based epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of PJI.
resultsThe total number of primary arthroplasty and septic revision procedures is increasing. The incidence of PJI is constant, although surgical techniques have improved over the years, with a multitude of possible preventive procedures for use before surgical treatment. This is most likely due to the increasing comorbidities and individual risk factors of the patient. Both endogenous and exogenous risk factors are known to be associated with PJI. Endogenous risk factors include diabetes, obesity, immunosuppression, oncological diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, previous or chronic infections, and bacteriuria. Exogenous risk factors include the extended duration of the operation, blood transfusion, and hypothermia. However, the facilities in the operating theatre or the use of iodine-impregnated incision drape seem to have no influence on the incidence of PJI. PROSPECT: The increasing number of arthroplasty procedures and the static incidence of PJI will result in an increase in the total number of PJIs in the next few years. In particular, the costs to the health care system of the treatment of PJI will emphasize further the need for the prevention of PJI. Individual risk factors should be optimized before arthroplasty requiring a close cooperation between the general practitioner and the orthopedic specialist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.