Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26526857›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2015

Highest power magnification with narrow-band imaging is useful for improving diagnostic performance for endoscopic delineation of early gastric cancers.

Kunihisa Uchita, Kenshi Yao, Noriya Uedo, Toshio Shimokawa, Takehiro Iwasaki, Koji Kojima, Ai Kawada, Mizu Nakayama, Michiyo Okazaki, Shinichi Iwamura

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Image-enhanced endoscopy in upper GI tract: State-of-the-art review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kunihisa UchitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. ucchy31@yahoo.co.jp.
Kenshi YaoDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital Japan, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-city, Fukuoka, 818-8502, Japan. yao@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
Noriya UedoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Japan, 3-3, Nakamichi 1-chome, Higashinari-ku, 537-8511, Osaka, Japan. noriya.uedo@gmail.com.
Toshio ShimokawaGraduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, 4-3-11 Takeda, Kofu City, 400-8511, Yamanashi, Japan. shimokawa@yamanashi.ac.jp.
Takehiro IwasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. space-rendez-vous@sings.jp.
Koji KojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. kozikozima22@gmail.com.
Ai KawadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. ai0happiness@yahoo.co.jp.
Mizu NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. aoi.blue.tomato125@gmail.com.
Michiyo OkazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. oka_krc@yahoo.co.jp.
Shinichi IwamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital Japan, 2-13-51 Sinhonmachi, Kochi-city, Kochi, 780-8562, Japan. iwamura@crocus.ocn.ne.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsMagnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is more reliable than chromoendoscopy (CE) for delineating the horizontal extent of early gastric cancers prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the added benefits of ME-NBI over CE in terms of the difference in magnification level have yet to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the improvement in diagnostic accuracy for tumor delineation obtained with different magnification levels of ME-NBI following CE. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study, performed at a single tertiary referral center. A series of 158 consecutive patients with 161 early gastric cancers resected en bloc using ESD was included in the study. The margins of each lesion were examined in their entirety using CE, followed by low power optical magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (LM-NBI), and finally the highest power optical magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (HM-NBI). The primary endpoint was the added benefit, as measured using the successful delineation rate, for the delineation of gastric cancer margins using CE + LM-NBI vs CE, and for CE + LM-NBI + HM-NBI vs CE + LM-NBI.

resultsThe successful delineation rates (95 % CI) using CE, CE + LM-NBI and CE + LM-NBI + HM-NBI were 72.7 % (68.5-79.9 %), 88.9 % (84.2-93.8 %), and 98.1 % (95.8-100 %). The diagnostic accuracy improved significantly for CE + LM-NBI compared with CE (P < 0.001), and for HM-NBI compared with LM-NBI (P < 0.001).

conclusionsHM-NBI is useful for improving diagnostic performance for endoscopic delineation of early gastric cancers, following CE and LM-NBI.

Indexed as

AgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGastroscopyHumansImage EnhancementMaleNarrow Band ImagingRetrospective StudiesStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26526857
PMCPMC4630876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.