Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26526746›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics and biology insights2015

Application of Functional Genomics for Bovine Respiratory Disease Diagnostics.

Aswathy N Rai, William B Epperson, Bindu Nanduri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aswathy N RaiDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, MS, USA.
William B EppersonDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, MS, USA.
Bindu NanduriDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, MS, USA. ; Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing, and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, MS, USA.

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
Zinc dependent conformational changes in AdcR and their impact on DNA bindingP20GM103646 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBAUDEAU, GISELLE · 2013 to 2022
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the most common economically important disease affecting cattle. For developing accurate diagnostics that can predict disease susceptibility/resistance and stratification, it is necessary to identify the molecular mechanisms that underlie BRD. To study the complex interactions among the bovine host and the multitude of viral and bacterial pathogens, as well as the environmental factors associated with BRD etiology, genome-scale high-throughput functional genomics methods such as microarrays, RNA-seq, and proteomics are helpful. In this review, we summarize the progress made in our understanding of BRD using functional genomics approaches. We also discuss some of the available bioinformatics resources for analyzing high-throughput data, in the context of biological pathways and molecular interactions. Although resources for studying host response to infection are avail-able, the corresponding information is lacking for majority of BRD pathogens, impeding progress in identifying diagnostic signatures for BRD using functional genomics approaches.

Indexed as

AgBasebovine genome atlasbovine respiratory disease (BRD)functional genomicshost–pathogen interaction database (HPIDB)

Identifiers

PMID26526746
PMCPMC4620937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.