ArticleSystematic biology2016
Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.
Article in Systematic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed.
- Into the wild: a long-term study of begomovirus community dynamics in a natural landscape.The Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- Article
- Reconciling fast Hepatitis B evolutionary rates with ancient co-divergence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary history of Jamestown Canyon virus reveals complex multi-vector ecology.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Lineages of PRRSV-2 from Canada Reveal Patterns of Transboundary Spread and Two Novel Sub-Lineages in North America.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The evolutionary history of the field vole species complex revealed by modern and ancient genomes.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Recovery of an 18bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary history of Jamestown Canyon virus disentangles complex multi-vector ecology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Biogeographic history of the Late Pleistocene and Holocene European small hamsters (subfamily Cricetinae).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Infinite Mixture Models for Improved Modeling of Across-Site Evolutionary Variation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genetic Evolution of the Hemagglutinin Genes of Seasonal Influenza A Viruses in Türkiye Between 2017 and 2023.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2025Article
- South Korea is the center for the origin and emanation of soybean mosaic virus with Bayesian phylogeographic inference.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Current Evolutionary Dynamics of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) in the U.S. a Decade After Introduction.Viruses · 2025Article
- Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and transmission dynamics of raccoon rabies virus in Connecticut.Virus evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing the effect of model specification and prior sensitivity on Bayesian tests of temporal signal.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Emergence of the B.1.214.2 SARS-CoV-2 lineage with an Omicron-like spike insertion and a unique upper airway immune signature.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Molecular epidemiology of recurrent zoonotic transmission of mpox virus in West Africa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Molecular evolution and phylogeographic analysis of wheat dwarf virus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marginal likelihood estimates to compare models using Bayes factors frequently accompany Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Approaches to estimate marginal likelihoods have garnered increased attention over the past decade. In particular, the introduction of path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone sampling (SS) into Bayesian phylogenetics has tremendously improved the accuracy of model selection. These sampling techniques are now used to evaluate complex evolutionary and population genetic models on empirical data sets, but considerable computational demands hamper their widespread adoption. Further, when very diffuse, but proper priors are specified for model parameters, numerical issues complicate the exploration of the priors, a necessary step in marginal likelihood estimation using PS or SS. To avoid such instabilities, generalized SS (GSS) has recently been proposed, introducing the concept of "working distributions" to facilitate--or shorten--the integration process that underlies marginal likelihood estimation. However, the need to fix the tree topology currently limits GSS in a coalescent-based framework. Here, we extend GSS by relaxing the fixed underlying tree topology assumption. To this purpose, we introduce a "working" distribution on the space of genealogies, which enables estimating marginal likelihoods while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. We propose two different "working" distributions that help GSS to outperform PS and SS in terms of accuracy when comparing demographic and evolutionary models applied to synthetic data and real-world examples. Further, we show that the use of very diffuse priors can lead to a considerable overestimation in marginal likelihood when using PS and SS, while still retrieving the correct marginal likelihood using both GSS approaches. The methods used in this article are available in BEAST, a powerful user-friendly software package to perform Bayesian evolutionary analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.