Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26525894›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Comparison of Xenorhabdus bovienii bacterial strain genomes reveals diversity in symbiotic functions.

Kristen E Murfin, Amy C Whooley, Jonathan L Klassen, Heidi Goodrich-Blair

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ExploringMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Conserved Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase inJournal of natural products · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen E MurfinDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. kmurfin@wisc.edu.
Amy C WhooleyDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. whooleyac@gmail.com.
Jonathan L KlassenDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. jonathan.klassen@uconn.edu.
Heidi Goodrich-BlairDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. hgblair@bact.wisc.edu.

Funding

Microbial Pathogenesis &Host Responses Training ProgramT32AI055397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BRUCE STEVEN · 2003 to 2024
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI055397NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI55397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundXenorhabdus bacteria engage in a beneficial symbiosis with Steinernema nematodes, in part by providing activities that help kill and degrade insect hosts for nutrition. Xenorhabdus strains (members of a single species) can display wide variation in host-interaction phenotypes and genetic potential indicating that strains may differ in their encoded symbiosis factors, including secreted metabolites.

methodsTo discern strain-level variation among symbiosis factors, and facilitate the identification of novel compounds, we performed a comparative analysis of the genomes of 10 Xenorhabdus bovienii bacterial strains.

resultsThe analyzed X. bovienii draft genomes are broadly similar in structure (e.g. size, GC content, number of coding sequences). Genome content analysis revealed that general classes of putative host-microbe interaction functions, such as secretion systems and toxin classes, were identified in all bacterial strains. In contrast, we observed diversity of individual genes within families (e.g. non-ribosomal peptide synthetase clusters and insecticidal toxin components), indicating the specific molecules secreted by each strain can vary. Additionally, phenotypic analysis indicates that regulation of activities (e.g. enzymes and motility) differs among strains.

conclusionsThe analyses presented here demonstrate that while general mechanisms by which X. bovienii bacterial strains interact with their invertebrate hosts are similar, the specific molecules mediating these interactions differ. Our data support that adaptation of individual bacterial strains to distinct hosts or niches has occurred. For example, diverse metabolic profiles among bacterial symbionts may have been selected by dissimilarities in nutritional requirements of their different nematode hosts. Similarly, factors involved in parasitism (e.g. immune suppression and microbial competition factors), likely differ based on evolution in response to naturally encountered organisms, such as insect hosts, competitors, predators or pathogens. This study provides insight into effectors of a symbiotic lifestyle, and also highlights that when mining Xenorhabdus species for novel natural products, including antibiotics and insecticidal toxins, analysis of multiple bacterial strains likely will increase the potential for the discovery of novel molecules.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, BacterialSymbiosisXenorhabdus

Identifiers

PMID26525894
PMCPMC4630870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.