Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26525782›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis.

Ying Jiao Zhao, Ai Leng Khoo, Gloria Tan, Monica Teng, Caroline Tee, Ban Hock Tan, Benjamin Ong, Boon Peng Lim, Louis Yi Ann Chai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Real-life comparison of posaconazole versus fluconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis during remission-induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2023
    Article
  9. Optimizing antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A cohort study of two different approaches.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Outcome of Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center StudyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ying Jiao ZhaoPharmacy and Therapeutics Office, Group Corporate Development, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.
Ai Leng KhooPharmacy and Therapeutics Office, Group Corporate Development, National Healthcare Group, Singapore ai_leng_khoo@nhg.com.sg.
Gloria TanPharmacoeconomics and Drug Utilisation, Health Products Regulation Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore.
Monica TengPharmacy and Therapeutics Office, Group Corporate Development, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.
Caroline TeeDepartment of Pharmacy, National University Health System, Singapore.
Ban Hock TanDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Benjamin OngPharmacoeconomics and Drug Utilisation, Health Products Regulation Group, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore.
Boon Peng LimPharmacy and Therapeutics Office, Group Corporate Development, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.
Louis Yi Ann ChaiDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Health Sciences Authority · SGNational University Health System · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.

Indexed as

AdultAntifungal AgentsAspergillusCandidaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFluconazoleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansItraconazoleLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicMycosesSingaporeAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleItraconazoleposaconazoleTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID26525782
PMCPMC4704197
OpenAlexW2276581170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.