Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26525537›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2015

The European LEMS Registry: Baseline Demographics and Treatment Approaches.

Renato Mantegazza, Andreas Meisel, Joern P Sieb, Gwendal Le Masson, Claude Desnuelle, Mirko Essing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: growing spectrum and relevance.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: For Cancer Patients.Cancer management and research · 2022
    Review
  12. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome in Lung Cancer.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Registries supporting new drug applications.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Renato MantegazzaIstituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. rmantegazza@istituto-besta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-5737
Andreas MeiselCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Joern P SiebHanse-Klinikum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.
Gwendal Le MassonHôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Claude DesnuelleCentre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires-CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Mirko EssingBioMarin Europe, Ltd., London, UK.
BioMarin (United Kingdom) · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITHôpital Pellegrin · FRUniversity of Applied Sciences Stralsund · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is a rare autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, clinically characterized by proximal muscle weakness and autonomic changes. LEMS is often associated with an underlying tumor (paraneoplastic form) but also occurs in the absence of cancer (idiopathic form). Treatment consists of immunomodulation (immunosuppression), anticancer treatment when carcinoma is present, and symptomatic treatment [acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and potassium channel blockers, e.g., amifampridine (3,4-diaminopyridine, i.e., 3,4-DAP), to improve neurotransmission]. Although there has long been information from case reports, several randomized controlled trials, and treatment guidelines, population data are still scarce.

methodsThe LEMS patient registry was launched in the European community in mid-2010 as a voluntary, multinational, observational, non-interventional program to collect structured empirical data on clinical course, treatment utilization, and safety and efficacy from the use of LEMS-specific treatments.

resultsSixty-nine patients have been enrolled [36 males, 32 females, 1 gender not reported; mean age 61.5 (27-84) years]. Eighteen patients (26%) were diagnosed with an associated carcinoma. At the time of enrollment, the majority of patients (65%) were receiving amifampridine [either compounded 3,4-DAP (22%) or 3,4-DAP phosphate, Firdapse(®) (43%)]. At enrollment, most patients demonstrate a profile of mild-to-moderate deficits in daily functioning but generally have good muscle strength, albeit with reduced deep tendon reflexes, frequent ataxia during walking, and signs of autonomic dysfunction including dry mouth, bladder dysfunction, and constipation.

conclusionThe LEMS European Union registry will continue to enroll patients and periodically report the accrued longitudinal data obtained on clinical assessments and laboratory findings, treatment practices, the safety and efficacy of treatment approaches, and long-term clinical outcomes.

fundingBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA, USA.

Indexed as

3,4-Diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP)AmifampridineFirdapseLambert–EatonLEMSRegistry

Identifiers

PMID26525537
PMCPMC4685864
OpenAlexW2180835860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.