GuidelineWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015
[Treatment of haemophilia in Austria].
Guideline in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment patterns and bleeding outcomes in persons with severe hemophilia A and B in a real-world setting.Annals of hematology · 2020Trial
- Influencing factors of the outcome of patients with haemophilia after knee replacement-a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- How much preoperative ROM and FC is a predictor for poor result after total knee arthroplasty in hemophilic arthropathy?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Pain management in hemophilia: expert recommendations.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Review
- Bleeding outcomes and factor utilization after switching to an extended half-life product for prophylaxis in haemophilia A in Austria.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- [Pain management in rare diseases].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Article
- Establishing an online physical exercise program for people with hemophilia.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2019Article
- [Pain therapy for children and adolescents with hemophilia : Recommendations by an expert panel].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This guideline which is endorsed by the Austrian Society of Haemophilia, the Austrian Society of Paediatrics, and the Austrian Society of Haematology & Medical Oncology is intended to give a clear and practical guidance for diagnosing and treating haemophilia in Austria. In the treatment of haemophilia there are few controlled interventional trials, and recommendations usually have a rather low level of evidence.The main basis for this paper are the new international guidelines by the World Federation of Hemophilia, published in 2013. These were adapted according to the local situation and experience.Covered topics are diagnostics, control visits, pharmacological treatment options, prophylaxis and treatment in children and adults, possible problems arising in haemophilia carriers and special aspects like home therapy, options for venous catheters, management of various traumas, bleedings and interventions, including dental procedures, and last not least inhibitors and their treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.