Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26525298›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Cnidaria: fast, reference-free clustering of raw and assembled genome and transcriptome NGS data.

Saulo Alves Aflitos, Edouard Severing, Gabino Sanchez-Perez, Sander Peters, Hans de Jong, Dick de Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saulo Alves AflitosApplied Bioinformatics, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. sauloalves.aflitos@wur.nl.
Edouard SeveringLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. severing@mpipz.mpg.de.
Gabino Sanchez-PerezApplied Bioinformatics, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. gabino.sanchezperez@wur.nl.
Sander PetersApplied Bioinformatics, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. sander.peters@wur.nl.
Hans de JongLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. hans.deJong@wur.nl.
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. dick.deridder@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of biological specimens is a requirement for a range of applications. Reference-free methods analyse unprocessed sequencing data without relying on prior knowledge, but generally do not scale to arbitrarily large genomes and arbitrarily large phylogenetic distances.

resultsWe present Cnidaria, a practical tool for clustering genomic and transcriptomic data with no limitation on genome size or phylogenetic distances. We successfully simultaneously clustered 169 genomic and transcriptomic datasets from 4 kingdoms, achieving 100% identification accuracy at supra-species level and 78% accuracy at the species level.

conclusionCNIDARIA allows for fast, resource-efficient comparison and identification of both raw and assembled genome and transcriptome data. This can help answer both fundamental (e.g. in phylogeny, ecological diversity analysis) and practical questions (e.g. sequencing quality control, primer design).

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceAnimalsCluster AnalysisGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInsectaInternetPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNASolanaceaeTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID26525298
PMCPMC4630969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.