Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26525072›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2015

The Foundations of Literacy Development in Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia.

Charles Hulme, Hannah M Nash, Debbie Gooch, Arne Lervåg, Margaret J Snowling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Communicative practices and perceptions towards stuttering people in South Africa.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
  18. Differences in Cortical Surface Area in Developmental Language Disorder.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles HulmeDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London c.hulme@ucl.ac.uk.
Hannah M NashDepartment of Psychology, University of Leeds.
Debbie GoochDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway College, University of London.
Arne LervågDepartment of Education, University of Oslo.
Margaret J SnowlingSt John's College, Oxford Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT082036AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of reading skills is underpinned by oral language abilities: Phonological skills appear to have a causal influence on the development of early word-level literacy skills, and reading-comprehension ability depends, in addition to word-level literacy skills, on broader (semantic and syntactic) language skills. Here, we report a longitudinal study of children at familial risk of dyslexia, children with preschool language difficulties, and typically developing control children. Preschool measures of oral language predicted phoneme awareness and grapheme-phoneme knowledge just before school entry, which in turn predicted word-level literacy skills shortly after school entry. Reading comprehension at 8½ years was predicted by word-level literacy skills at 5½ years and by language skills at 3½ years. These patterns of predictive relationships were similar in both typically developing children and those at risk of literacy difficulties. Our findings underline the importance of oral language skills for the development of both word-level literacy and reading comprehension.

Indexed as

ComprehensionPhoneticsReadingSemanticsChildChild, PreschoolDyslexiaFemaleHumansLanguage TestsLiteracyLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomdyslexiafamilial risklanguage impairmentlanguage skillsphonological skillsreading comprehensionreading development

Identifiers

PMID26525072
PMCPMC4676358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.