Observational studyEuropean journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine2017
The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool.
Observational study in European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05107297 (Comparison of National Early Warning Score), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of National Early Warning Score (NEWS) & Sepsis Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department (SPEED) for The Early Identification of Sepsis in the Emergency Department
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal validation of the Ramathibodi Older Sepsis Score (ROSS) for predicting 28-day mortality of older sepsis patients in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Parsimonious Waveform-derived Features consisting of Pulse Arrival Time and Heart Rate Variability Predicts the Onset of Septic Shock.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2024Article
- Hierarchical Capability in Distinguishing Severities of Sepsis via Serum Lactate: A Network Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Predictive models for short-term mortality and length of hospital stay among adults with community-onset bacteraemia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: application of early data dynamics.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Head-to-head comparison of 19 prediction models for short-term outcome in medical patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- The Available Criteria for Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department-A Retrospective Assessment.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2021Article
- Rethinking animal models of sepsis - working towards improved clinical translation whilst integrating the 3Rs.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2020Review
- Sepsis patient evaluation emergency department (SPEED) score & mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score in predicting 28-day mortality of emergency sepsis patients.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2019Article
- FUTURES: Forecasting the Unexpected Transfer to Upgraded REsources in Sepsis.Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare · 2019Article
- Current Issues and Perspectives in Patients with Possible Sepsis at Emergency Departments.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- A Sepsis-related Diagnosis Impacts Interventions and Predicts Outcomes for Emergency Patients with Severe Sepsis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2017Observational
- Observational
- Display and perception of risk: Analysis of decision support system display and its impact on perceived clinical risk of sepsis-induced health deterioration.Health informatics journalArticle
- Association between site of infection and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Medellin, Colombia.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the study was to identify covariates associated with 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the emergency department and derive and validate a score that stratifies mortality risk utilizing parameters that are readily available.
methodsPatients with an admission diagnosis of suspected or confirmed infection and fulfilling at least two criteria for severe inflammatory response syndrome were included in this study. Patients' characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory values were used to identify prognostic factors for mortality. A scoring system was derived and validated. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate.
resultsA total of 440 patients were included in the study. The 28-day hospital mortality rate was 32.4 and 25.2% for the derivation (293 patients) and validation (147 patients) sets, respectively. Factors associated with a higher mortality were immune-suppressed state (odds ratio 4.7; 95% confidence interval 2.0-11.4), systolic blood pressure on arrival less than 90 mmHg (3.8; 1.7-8.3), body temperature less than 36.0°C (4.1; 1.3-12.9), oxygen saturation less than 90% (2.3; 1.1-4.8), hematocrit less than 0.38 (3.1; 1.6-5.9), blood pH less than 7.35 (2.0; 1.04-3.9), lactate level more than 2.4 mmol/l (2.27; 1.2-4.2), and pneumonia as the source of infection (2.7; 1.5-5.0). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (0.75-0.86) in the derivation and 0.81 (0.73-0.90) in the validation set. The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score performed better (P=0.02) than the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score when applied to the complete study population with an area under the curve of 0.81 (0.76-0.85) as compared with 0.74 (0.70-0.79).
conclusionThe SPEED score predicts 28-day mortality in septic patients. It is simple and its predictive value is comparable to that of other scoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.