Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26524505›Full record

ReviewExperimental cell research2016

Mechanosensing via cell-matrix adhesions in 3D microenvironments.

Andrew D Doyle, Kenneth M Yamada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental cell research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Deep learning reveals how cells pull, buckle, and navigate fibrous environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of iPSC-Derived Smooth Muscle Cells to Model Physiology and Pathology.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew D DoyleLaboratory of Cell and Developmental Biology, Cell Biology Section, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: adoyle@mail.nih.gov.
Kenneth M YamadaLaboratory of Cell and Developmental Biology, Cell Biology Section, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: kyamada@dir.nidcr.nih.gov.

Funding

Cell-Matrix Interactions and MigrationZIADE000524 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI YAMADA, KENNETH · 2009 to 2025
$10.2M
Matrix Organization and DimensionalityZIADE000718 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI YAMADA, KENNETH · 2009 to 2025
$8.9M
INTEGRIN RECEPTOR FUNCTION AND SIGNALINGZ01DE000524 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI YAMADA, KENNETH MANAO · 1991 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DE000524Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DE999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment plays a central role in cell migration by providing physiochemical information that influences overall cell behavior. Much of this external information is accessed by direct interaction of the cell with ECM ligands and structures via integrin-based adhesions that are hypothesized to act as mechanosensors for testing the surrounding microenvironment. Our current understanding of these mechanical complexes is derived primarily from studies of cellular adhesions formed on two-dimensional (2D) substrates in vitro. Yet the rules of cell/ECM engagement and mechanosensing in three-dimensional (3D) microenvironments are invariably more complex under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. Here we review the current understanding of how cellular mechanosensing occurs through adhesion complexes within 3D microenvironments and discuss how these mechanisms can vary and differ from interactions on 2D substrates.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCell AdhesionCell-Matrix JunctionsCollagen Type IHumansMolecular ConformationCollagen Type I3D migrationAdhesionCollagenContractilityDynamicsMechanotransduction

Identifiers

PMID26524505
PMCPMC4851608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.