Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26524326›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2015

Clinical perspectives on echinocandin resistance among Candida species.

Ryan K Shields, M Hong Nguyen, Cornelius J Clancy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of bloodstreamThe Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Liposomal amphotericin B-the future.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  7. Pan-Echinocandin ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infection in patients with severe liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Danish Whole-Genome-SequencedJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antifungal Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Review on Current Status of Echinocandins Use.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan K ShieldsaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh bVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
M Hong Nguyen
Cornelius J Clancy
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Caspofungin pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics during intra-adbominal candidiasisK08AI114883 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIELDS, RYAN K · 2015 to 2019
$858k
Candida albicans gene expression during intra-abdominal infectionsR21AI107290 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NGUYEN, M. HONG THI · 2014 to 2015
$450k
Candida albicans responses to antifungals and cell wall stressI01BX001955 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI CLANCY, CORNELIUS J · 2014 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001955NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI114883NIAID NIH HHS K08AI114883NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI107290NIAID NIH HHS R21AI107290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe review and offer our clinical perspectives on the emergence of echinocandin-resistant Candida. RECENT

findingsCandida FKS gene mutations attenuate echinocandin activity, but overall mutation rates among clinical isolates remain low (Candida glabrata, ∼4%; other species, <1%). Rates are higher with prior echinocandin exposure, exceeding 50% among C. glabrata or Candida albicans isolates causing breakthrough invasive candidiasis. The median duration of prior echinocandin exposure among FKS mutant isolates is ∼100 days. The clinical usefulness of echinocandin susceptibility testing is limited by the low overall prevalence of resistance, and uncertainties surrounding testing methods and interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). In single-center studies, caspofungin resistance (defined using institution-specific MIC breakpoints) was 32-53% sensitive and 75-95% specific for predicting treatment outcomes of C. glabrata invasive candidiasis; corresponding values for the presence of an FKS mutation were 35-41% and 90-98%. Results were similar using anidulafungin and micafungin MICs. Clinical data are scarce for non-C. glabrata species. SUMMARY: Echinocandins remain preferred agents against invasive Candida infections. Susceptibility testing and FKS genotypic testing do not have roles in routine clinical practice, but may be useful in newly-diagnosed patients who are echinocandin-experienced or those who have not responded to echinocandin treatment.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisCandidiasis, InvasiveDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26524326
PMCPMC4632243
OpenAlexW1946090000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.