Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26524232›Full record

ArticleExperimental aging research2015

Data Harmonization in Aging Research: Not so Fast.

Margaret Gatz, Chandra A Reynolds, Deborah Finkel, Chris J Hahn, Yan Zhou, Catalina Zavala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental aging research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IGEMS: The Consortium on Interplay of Genes and Environment Across Multiple Studies - An Update.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. The Interplay of Genes and Environment Across Multiple Studies (IGEMS) Consortium After Fifteen Years.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dementia and mortality in older adults: A twin study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret Gatza Department of Psychology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Chandra A Reynoldsc Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , Riverside , California , USA.
Deborah Finkeld Department of Psychology, Indiana University Southeast , New Albany , Indiana , USA.
Chris J Hahne Department of Preventive Medicine , Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Yan Zhouf American Board of Anesthesiology , Raleigh , North Carolina , USA.
Catalina Zavalac Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , Riverside , California , USA.

Funding

Gene-Environment Interplay of Social Contexts and Aging-Related OutcomesR01AG037985 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PEDERSEN, NANCY L · 2010 to 2014
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/study contextHarmonizing measures in order to conduct pooled data analyses has become a scientific priority in aging research. Retrospective harmonization where different studies lack common measures of comparable constructs presents a major challenge. This study compared different approaches to harmonization with a crosswalk sample who completed multiple versions of the measures to be harmonized.

methodsThrough online recruitment, 1061 participants aged 30 to 98 answered two different depression scales, and 1065 participants answered multiple measures of subjective health. Rational and configural methods of harmonization were applied, using the crosswalk sample to determine their success; and empirical item response theory (IRT) methods were applied in order empirically to compare items from different measures as answered by the same person.

resultsFor depression, IRT worked well to provide a conversion table between different measures. The rational method of extracting semantically matched items from each of the two scales proved an acceptable alternative to IRT. For subjective health, only configural harmonization was supported. The subjective health items used in most studies form a single robust factor.

conclusionCaution is required in aging research when pooling data across studies using different measures of the same construct. Of special concern are response scales that vary widely in the number of response options, especially if the anchors are asymmetrical. A crosswalk sample that has completed items from each of the measures being harmonized allows the investigator to use empirical approaches to identify flawed assumptions in rational or configural approaches to harmonizing.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalHealth StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26524232
PMCPMC4772674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.