Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26523848›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2016

Comparative population genomics of latitudinal variation in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.

Heather E Machado, Alan O Bergland, Katherine R O'Brien, Emily L Behrman, Paul S Schmidt, Dmitri A Petrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Invasive African fig flies (microPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather E MachadoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305-5020, USA.
Alan O BerglandDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305-5020, USA.
Katherine R O'BrienSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 348 Manter Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Emily L BehrmanDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 102 Leidy Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6313, USA.
Paul S SchmidtDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 102 Leidy Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6313, USA.
Dmitri A PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305-5020, USA.

Funding

Genomics of rapid adaptation on seasonal timescales in D. melanogasterR01GM100366 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHMIDT, PAUL · 2012 to 2019
$3.3M
Sequencing yeast lines to measure rates of neutral and deleterious mutationsR01GM097415 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI, SIEGAL, MARK L · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
Population Genomics of Adaptive Transposition in DrosophilaR01GM089926 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2010 to 2013
$969k
Genomics of natural populationsF32GM097837 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BERGLAND, ALAN OLAV · 2011 to 2013
$148k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM097837NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089926NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097415NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examples of clinal variation in phenotypes and genotypes across latitudinal transects have served as important models for understanding how spatially varying selection and demographic forces shape variation within species. Here, we examine the selective and demographic contributions to latitudinal variation through the largest comparative genomic study to date of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster, with genomic sequence data from 382 individual fruit flies, collected across a spatial transect of 19 degrees latitude and at multiple time points over 2 years. Consistent with phenotypic studies, we find less clinal variation in D. simulans than D. melanogaster, particularly for the autosomes. Moreover, we find that clinally varying loci in D. simulans are less stable over multiple years than comparable clines in D. melanogaster. D. simulans shows a significantly weaker pattern of isolation by distance than D. melanogaster and we find evidence for a stronger contribution of migration to D. simulans population genetic structure. While population bottlenecks and migration can plausibly explain the differences in stability of clinal variation between the two species, we also observe a significant enrichment of shared clinal genes, suggesting that the selective forces associated with climate are acting on the same genes and phenotypes in D. simulans and D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila simulansGene FrequencyGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAUnited Statescomparative genomicsDrosophilalatitudinal clinelatitudinal variationparallelismpopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID26523848
PMCPMC5089931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.