ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2016
A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- From gut to brain: unveiling probiotic effects through a neuroimaging perspective-A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Delineating visual, auditory and motor regions in the human brain with functional neuroimaging: a BrainMap-based meta-analytic synthesis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Brain connectivity under light sedation with midazolam and ketamine during task performance and the periodic experience of pain: Examining concordance between different approaches for seed-based connectivity analysis.Brain imaging and behavior · 2023Trial
- Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.Brain stimulationTrial
- Assessment of dynamic cerebral blood flow changes during cognitive tasks in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.Brain communications · 2026Article
- The Neurobiology of Cognitive Fatigue and Its Influence on Effort-Based Choice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Management of obesity in an individual with ROHHAD syndrome with semaglutide 2.4 mg/week: a case report.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025Article
- Individual Variability in Brain Connectivity Patterns and Driving-Fatigue Dynamics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The elusive metric of lesion load.Brain structure & function · 2023Review
- Unsupervised Registration Refinement for Generating Unbiased Eye Atlas.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- Evaluation of functional MRI-based human brain parcellation: a review.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Review
- Whole-Brain Network Models: From Physics to Bedside.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Construction of a Multi-Phase Contrast Computed Tomography Kidney Atlas.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Evolution of Human Brain Atlases in Terms of Content, Applications, Functionality, and Availability.Neuroinformatics · 2021Review
- The neural correlates of low social integration as a risk factor for suicide.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Article
- Functional Parcellation of Individual Cerebral Cortex Based on Functional MRI.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- MODEL ASSISTED VARIABLE CLUSTERING: MINIMAX-OPTIMAL RECOVERY AND ALGORITHMS.Annals of statistics · 2020Article
- Exploring distinct default mode and semantic networks using a systematic ICA approach.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- The neural representation of the association between comorbid drug use disorders and childhood maltreatment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growth of functional MRI has led to development of human brain atlases derived by parcellating resting-state connectivity patterns into functionally independent regions of interest (ROIs). All functional atlases to date have been derived from resting-state fMRI data. But given that functional connectivity between regions varies with task, we hypothesized that an atlas incorporating both resting-state and task-based fMRI data would produce an atlas with finer characterization of task-relevant regions than an atlas derived from resting-state alone. To test this hypothesis, we derived parcellation atlases from twenty-nine healthy adult participants enrolled in the Cognitive Connectome project, an initiative to improve functional MRI's translation into clinical decision-making by mapping normative variance in brain-behavior relationships. Participants underwent resting-state and task-based fMRI spanning nine cognitive domains: motor, visuospatial, attention, language, memory, affective processing, decision-making, working memory, and executive function. Spatially constrained n-cut parcellation derived brain atlases using (1) all participants' functional data (Task) or (2) a single resting-state scan (Rest). An atlas was also derived from random parcellation for comparison purposes (Random). Two methods were compared: (1) a parcellation applied to the group's mean edge weights (mean), and (2) a two-stage approach with parcellation of individual edge weights followed by parcellation of mean binarized edges (two-stage). The resulting Task and Rest atlases had significantly greater similarity with each other (mean Jaccard indices JI=0.72-0.85) than with the Random atlases (JI=0.59-0.63; all p<0.001 after Bonferroni correction). Task and Rest atlas similarity was greatest for the two-stage method (JI=0.85), which has been shown as more robust than the mean method; these atlases also better reproduced voxelwise seed maps of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during rest and performing the n-back working memory task (r=0.75-0.80) than the Random atlases (r=0.64-0.72), further validating their utility. We expected regions governing higher-order cognition (such as frontal and anterior temporal lobes) to show greatest difference between Task and Rest atlases; contrary to expectations, these areas had greatest similarity between atlases. Our findings indicate that atlases derived from parcellation of task-based and resting-state fMRI data are highly comparable, and existing resting-state atlases are suitable for task-based analyses. We introduce an anatomically labeled fMRI-derived whole-brain human atlas for future Cognitive Connectome analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.