Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26523396›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front.

Chi-Fang Wu, Jian-Geng Chiou, Maria Minakova, Benjamin Woods, Denis Tsygankov, Trevin R Zyla, Natasha S Savage, Timothy C Elston, Daniel J Lew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Roles for the canonical polarity machinery in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms that ensure monogamous mating inMolecular biology of the cell · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi-Fang WuDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Jian-Geng ChiouDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Maria MinakovaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Benjamin WoodsDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Denis TsygankovDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Trevin R ZylaDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Natasha S SavageInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Timothy C ElstonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Daniel J LewDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Duke University Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke Medical Center · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

POLARITY ESTABLISHMENT IN YEASTR01GM062300 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEW, DANIEL J · 2001 to 2016
$5.0M
Spatiotemporal modeling of signal transduction in yeastR01GM079271 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C, ERREDE, BEVERLY · 2006 to 2017
$4.0M
Gradient Tracking and ChemotropismR01GM103870 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C, LEW, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062300NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079271NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103870NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM62300Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarity establishment in many cells is thought to occur via positive feedback that reinforces even tiny asymmetries in polarity protein distribution. Cdc42 and related GTPases are activated and accumulate in a patch of the cortex that defines the front of the cell. Positive feedback enables spontaneous polarization triggered by stochastic fluctuations, but as such fluctuations can occur at multiple locations, how do cells ensure that they make only one front? In polarizing cells of the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, positive feedback can trigger growth of several Cdc42 clusters at the same time, but this multi-cluster stage rapidly evolves to a single-cluster state, which then promotes bud emergence. By manipulating polarity protein dynamics, we show that resolution of multi-cluster intermediates occurs through a greedy competition between clusters to recruit and retain polarity proteins from a shared intracellular pool.

Indexed as

Cell Polaritycdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFeedback, PhysiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiaecdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeCdc42cell biologycell polarityS. cerevisiaeTuring model

Identifiers

PMID26523396
PMCPMC4728132
OpenAlexW2231378243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.