Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26523389›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

A robust transcriptional program in newts undergoing multiple events of lens regeneration throughout their lifespan.

Konstantinos Sousounis, Feng Qi, Manisha C Yadav, José Luis Millán, Fubito Toyama, Chikafumi Chiba, Yukiko Eguchi, Goro Eguchi, Panagiotis A Tsonis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Single Cell Atlas of the Newt Iris During Lens Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Telomerase gene therapy: a remission toward cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Salamander Insights Into Ageing and Rejuvenation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konstantinos SousounisDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, United States.
Feng QiSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute at Lake Nona, Orlando, United States.
Manisha C YadavSanford Children's Health Research Center, Sanford-Burnham-Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, United States.
José Luis MillánSanford Children's Health Research Center, Sanford-Burnham-Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, United States.
Fubito ToyamaGraduate School of Engineering, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Chikafumi ChibaFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yukiko EguchiNational Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes for Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Goro EguchiNational Institute for Basic Biology, National Institutes for Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Panagiotis A TsonisDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, United States.

Funding

GENE REGULATION IN LENS REGENERATIONR01EY010540 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI TSONIS, PANAGIOTIS A · 1995 to 2013
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY10540NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newts have the ability to repeatedly regenerate their lens even during ageing. However, it is unclear whether this regeneration reflects an undisturbed genetic activity. To answer this question, we compared the transcriptomes of lenses, irises and tails from aged newts that had undergone lens regeneration 19 times with the equivalent tissues from young newts that had never experienced lens regeneration. Our analysis indicates that repeatedly regenerated lenses showed a robust transcriptional program comparable to young never-regenerated lenses. In contrast, the tail, which was never regenerated, showed gene expression signatures of ageing. Our analysis strongly suggests that, with respect to gene expression, the regenerated lenses have not deviated from a robust transcriptional program even after multiple events of regeneration throughout the life of the newt. In addition, our study provides a new paradigm in biology, and establishes the newt as a key model for the study of regeneration in relation to ageing.

Indexed as

RegenerationTranscription, GeneticAnimalsLens, CrystallineSalamandridaeageingdevelopmental biologynewtregenerationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID26523389
PMCPMC4739772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.