Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26523321›Full record

ArticleIRB

Public Comments on Proposed Regulatory Reforms That Would Impact Biospecimen Research: The Good, the Bad, and the Puzzling.

R Jean Cadigan, Daniel K Nelson, Gail E Henderson, Anders G Nelson, Arlene M Davis

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in IRB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019
    Article
  3. Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2019
    Article
  4. Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2016
    Article
  5. With great (participant) rights comes great (researcher) responsibility.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Jean Cadigan
Daniel K Nelson
Gail E Henderson
Anders G Nelson
Arlene M Davis

Funding

UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
Center for Genomics and SocietyP50HG004488 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2007 to 2017
$12.6M
From Specimen to Biobank: Using an Organizational Perspective to Study ELSI IssueR01HG005227 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2010 to 2010
$603k
NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1RR025747-04S1NCRR NIH HHS U54RR024382-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS P50HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005227NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005227-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPublic OpinionBiomedical ResearchEthics Committees, ResearchHuman ExperimentationHumansSpecimen HandlingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26523321
PMCPMC6763272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.