Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26523100›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Disease monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease.

Shannon Chang, Lisa Malter, David Hudesman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02796339 (A Phase-II Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of a Nutritional Supplement With Natural Mastiha in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02796339 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Phase-II Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of a Nutritional Supplement With Natural Mastiha in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarokopio UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesArmsMastiha, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon ChangShannon Chang, Lisa Malter, David Hudesman, Division of Gastroenterology, New York University, New York City, NY 10016, United States.
Lisa MalterShannon Chang, Lisa Malter, David Hudesman, Division of Gastroenterology, New York University, New York City, NY 10016, United States.
David HudesmanShannon Chang, Lisa Malter, David Hudesman, Division of Gastroenterology, New York University, New York City, NY 10016, United States.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal method for monitoring quiescent disease in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis is yet to be determined. Endoscopic evaluation with ileocolonoscopy is the gold standard but is invasive, costly, and time-consuming. There are many commercially available biomarkers that may be used in clinical practice to evaluate disease status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the most widely adopted biomarkers are C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). This review summarizes the evidence for utilizing CRP and FC for monitoring IBD during clinical remission and after surgical resection. Endoscopic correlation with CRP and FC is evaluated in each disease state. Advantages and drawbacks of each biomarker are discussed with special consideration of isolated ileal CD. Fecal immunochemical testing, traditionally used for colorectal cancer screening, is mentioned as a potential new alternative assay in the evaluation of IBD. Based on a mixture of information gleaned from biomarkers, clinical status, and endoscopic evaluation, the best treatment decisions can be made for the patient with IBD.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemBiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeC-Reactive ProteinCrohn DiseaseEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFecesHumansImmunohistochemistryInflammation MediatorsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInflammation MediatorsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexBiomarkersC-reactive proteinCrohn’s diseaseFecal calprotectinFecal immunochemical testInflammatory bowel diseasePostoperative recurrenceRemissionUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID26523100
PMCPMC4616202
OpenAlexW2413846149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.