Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26521212›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2016

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a population-based study.

Irene Orlow, Anne S Reiner, Nancy E Thomas, Pampa Roy, Peter A Kanetsky, Li Luo, Susan Paine, Bruce K Armstrong, Anne Kricker, Loraine D Marrett and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current Molecular Markers of Melanoma and Treatment Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Irene Orlow
Anne S Reiner
Nancy E ThomasDepartment of Dermatology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Pampa Roy
Peter A KanetskyDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Li LuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Susan PaineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Bruce K ArmstrongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Anne KrickerSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Loraine D MarrettPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2L7, Canada.
Stefano RossoPiedmont Cancer Registry, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology in Piedmont, Turin 10126, Italy.
Roberto ZanettiPiedmont Cancer Registry, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology in Piedmont, Turin 10126, Italy.
Stephen B GruberUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Hoda Anton-CulverDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.
Richard P GallagherCancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Terence DwyerThe George Institute for Global Health, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BD, UK and.
Klaus BusamDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Colin B Begg
Marianne BerwickDepartment of Internal Medicine, Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
GEM Study Group

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
Melanoma RAS/BRAF Mutation:Heterogeneity-Risk-PrognosisR01CA112243 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THOMAS, NANCY E. · 2005 to 2014
$5.4M
A MODEL FOR GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY: MELANOMAU01CA083180 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI BERWICK, MARIANNE · 1999 to 2003
$5.2M
Solar Exposure and Melanoma SurvivalR01CA112524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI BERWICK, MARIANNE · 2005 to 2009
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NCI NIH HHS CA112243NCI NIH HHS CA112243-05S1NCI NIH HHS CA112524NCI NIH HHS CA112524-S1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30-CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112524NCI NIH HHS U01 CA083180PHS HHS UO183180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors known to affect melanoma survival include age at presentation, sex and tumor characteristics. Polymorphisms also appear to modulate survival following diagnosis. Result from other studies suggest that vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms (SNPs) impact survival in patients with glioma, renal cell carcinoma, lung, breast, prostate and other cancers; however, a comprehensive study of VDR polymorphisms and melanoma-specific survival is lacking. We aimed to investigate whether VDR genetic variation influences survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma. The analysis involved 3566 incident single and multiple primary melanoma cases enrolled in the international population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma Study. Melanoma-specific survival outcomes were calculated for each of 38 VDR SNPs using a competing risk analysis after adjustment for covariates. There were 254 (7.1%) deaths due to melanoma during the median 7.6 years follow-up period. VDR SNPs rs7299460, rs3782905, rs2239182, rs12370156, rs2238140, rs7305032, rs1544410 (BsmI) and rs731236 (TaqI) each had a statistically significant (trend P values < 0.05) association with melanoma-specific survival in multivariate analysis. One functional SNP (rs2239182) remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing using the Monte Carlo method. None of the SNPs associated with survival were significantly associated with Breslow thickness, ulceration or mitosis. These results suggest that the VDR gene may influence survival from melanoma, although the mechanism by which VDR exerts its effect does not seem driven by tumor aggressiveness. Further investigations are needed to confirm our results and to understand the relationship between VDR and survival in the combined context of tumor and host characteristics.

Indexed as

AustraliaCanadaFemaleGenotypeHaplotypesHumansItalyMaleMelanomaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, CalcitriolSkin NeoplasmsUnited StatesReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26521212
PMCPMC4715233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.