Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26521190›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2015

Hypertonic Saline in Conjunction with High-Dose Furosemide Improves Dose-Response Curves in Worsening Refractory Congestive Heart Failure.

Salvatore Paterna, Francesca Di Gaudio, Vincenzo La Rocca, Fabio Balistreri, Massimiliano Greco, Daniele Torres, Umberto Lupo, Giuseppina Rizzo, Pietro di Pasquale, Sergio Indelicato and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore PaternaDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesca Di GaudioDipartimento Biopatologia e Biotecnologie Mediche e Forensi (DiBiMEF), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vincenzo La RoccaDipartimento Energia, Ingegneria dell'Informazione e Modelli Matematici (DEIM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fabio BalistreriDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Massimiliano GrecoDipartimento Biopatologia e Biotecnologie Mediche e Forensi (DiBiMEF), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Daniele TorresDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Umberto LupoDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppina RizzoUO Medicina D'Urgenza e Pronto Soccorso AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Pietro di PasqualeUO di Cardiologia "Paolo Borsellino", Ospedale GF Ingrassia Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sergio IndelicatoDipartimento Biopatologia e Biotecnologie Mediche e Forensi (DiBiMEF), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco CuttittaDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Javed ButlerCardiology Division, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Gaspare ParrinelloDipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica (DIBIMIS), AOUP "Paolo Giaccone" Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy. gaspare.parrinello@unipa.it.
University of Palermo · ITOspedale G.F. Ingrassia · ITStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiuretic responsiveness in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) is better assessed by urine production per unit diuretic dose than by the absolute urine output or diuretic dose. Diuretic resistance arises over time when the plateau rate of sodium and water excretion is reached prior to optimal fluid elimination and may be overcome when hypertonic saline solution (HSS) is added to high doses of furosemide.

methodsForty-two consecutively hospitalized patients with refractory CHF were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to furosemide doses (125 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg) so that all patients received intravenous furosemide diluted in 150 ml of normal saline (0.9%) in the first step (0-24 h) and the same furosemide dose diluted in 150 ml of HSS (1.4%) in the next step (24-48 h) as to obtain 3 groups as follows: Fourteen patients receiving 125 mg (group 1), fourteen patients receiving 250 mg (group 2), and fourteen patients receiving 500 mg (group 3) of furosemide. Urine samples of all patients were collected at 30, 60, and 90 min, and 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 24 h after infusion. Diuresis, sodium excretion, osmolality, and furosemide concentration were evaluated for each urine sample.

resultsAfter randomization, 40 patients completed the study. Two patients, one in group 2 and one in group 3 dropped out. Patients in group 1 (125 mg furosemide) had a mean age of 77 ± 17 years, 43% were male, 6 (43%) had heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and 64% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV; the mean age of patients in group 2 (250 mg furosemide) was 80 ± 8.1 years, 15% were male, 5 (38%) had HFpEF, and 84% were in NYHA class IV; and the mean age of patients in group 3 (500 mg furosemide) was 73 ± 12 years, 54% were male, 6 (46%) had HFpEF, and 69% were in NYHA class IV. HSS added to furosemide increased total urine output, sodium excretion, urinary osmolality, and furosemide urine delivery in all patients and at all time points. The percentage increase was 18,14, and 14% for urine output; 29, 24, and 16% for total sodium excretion; 45, 34, and 20% for urinary osmolarity; and 27, 36, and 32% for total furosemide excretion in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These findings were translated in an improvement in the furosemide dose-response curves in these patients.

conclusionThese results may serve as new pathophysiological basis for HSS use in the treatment of refractory CHF.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDiureticsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug ToleranceFemaleFurosemideHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsmolar ConcentrationSaline Solution, HypertonicSodiumDiureticsFurosemideSaline Solution, HypertonicSodiumDose–response curvesFurosemideHeart failureHypertonic salineRefractory chronic heart failure

Identifiers

PMID26521190
PMCPMC4635178
OpenAlexW2216662221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.