Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26521184›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2016

Detection of cervical lesions by multivariate analysis of diffuse reflectance spectra: a clinical study.

Vasumathi Gopala Prabitha, Sambasivan Suchetha, Jayaraj Lalitha Jayanthi, Kamalasanan Vijayakumary Baiju, Prabhakaran Rema, Koyippurath Anuraj, Anita Mathews, Paul Sebastian, Narayanan Subhash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vasumathi Gopala PrabithaBiophotonics Laboratory, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Akkulam, Thiruvananthapuram, 695 031, Kerala, India.
Sambasivan SuchethaRegional Cancer Centre, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, Kerala, India.
Jayaraj Lalitha JayanthiRegional Cancer Centre, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, Kerala, India.
Kamalasanan Vijayakumary BaijuDepartment of Statistics, Government College for Women, Thiruvananthapuram, 695014, Kerala, India.
Prabhakaran RemaRegional Cancer Centre, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, Kerala, India.
Koyippurath AnurajBiophotonics Laboratory, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Akkulam, Thiruvananthapuram, 695 031, Kerala, India.
Anita MathewsRegional Cancer Centre, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, Kerala, India.
Paul SebastianRegional Cancer Centre, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, Kerala, India.
Narayanan SubhashBiophotonics Laboratory, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Akkulam, Thiruvananthapuram, 695 031, Kerala, India. subhashnarayanan@gmail.com.
Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram · INNational Centre for Earth Science Studies · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse reflectance (DR) spectroscopy is a non-invasive, real-time, and cost-effective tool for early detection of malignant changes in squamous epithelial tissues. The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic power of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for non-invasive discrimination of cervical lesions in vivo. A clinical trial was carried out on 48 sites in 34 patients by recording DR spectra using a point-monitoring device with white light illumination. The acquired data were analyzed and classified using multivariate statistical analysis based on principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Diagnostic accuracies were validated using random number generators. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for evaluating the discriminating power of the proposed statistical technique. An algorithm was developed and used to classify non-diseased (normal) from diseased sites (abnormal) with a sensitivity of 72 % and specificity of 87 %. While low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) could be discriminated from normal with a sensitivity of 56 % and specificity of 80 %, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) from normal with a sensitivity of 89 % and specificity of 97 %, LSIL could be discriminated from HSIL with 100 % sensitivity and specificity. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.993 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.0 to 1) and 1 (95 % CI 1) for the discrimination of HSIL from normal and HSIL from LSIL, respectively. The results of the study show that DR spectroscopy could be used along with multivariate analytical techniques as a non-invasive technique to monitor cervical disease status in real time.

Indexed as

Spectrum AnalysisAdultAlgorithmsDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleHumansMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisROC CurveUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancer detectionDiffuse reflectance spectroscopyLinear discriminant analysisMultivariate analysisOptical biopsyPrincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID26521184
OpenAlexW2137280636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.