Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520742›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2015

Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy.

Faranak Aghaei, Maxine Tan, Alan B Hollingsworth, Wei Qian, Hong Liu, Bin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning in breast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faranak AghaeiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019.
Maxine TanSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019.
Alan B HollingsworthMercy Women's Center, Mercy Health Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120.
Wei QianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas, El Paso, Texas 79968.
Hong LiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019.

Funding

Increasing Cancer Detection Yield Using Breast MRI Screening ModalityR01CA197150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, ALAN B., LIU, HONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Mammographic Density and Tissue Asymmetry Based Breast Cancer Risk StratificationR01CA160205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZHENG, BIN · 2012 to 2015
$895k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160205NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify a new clinical marker based on quantitative kinetic image features analysis and assess its feasibility to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThe authors assembled a dataset involving breast MR images acquired from 68 cancer patients before undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 25 patients had complete response (CR) and 43 had partial and nonresponse (NR) to chemotherapy based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The authors developed a computer-aided detection scheme to segment breast areas and tumors depicted on the breast MR images and computed a total of 39 kinetic image features from both tumor and background parenchymal enhancement regions. The authors then applied and tested two approaches to classify between CR and NR cases. The first one analyzed each individual feature and applied a simple feature fusion method that combines classification results from multiple features. The second approach tested an attribute selected classifier that integrates an artificial neural network (ANN) with a wrapper subset evaluator, which was optimized using a leave-one-case-out validation method.

resultsIn the pool of 39 features, 10 yielded relatively higher classification performance with the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 to classify between CR and NR cases. Using a feature fusion method, the maximum AUC=0.85±0.05. Using the ANN-based classifier, AUC value significantly increased to 0.96±0.03 (p<0.01).

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of kinetic image features computed from breast MR images acquired prechemotherapy has potential to generate a useful clinical marker in predicting tumor response to chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26520742
PMCPMC4617733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.