Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520682›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2015

Crosstalk between stem cell and cell cycle machineries.

Michael S Kareta, Julien Sage, Marius Wernig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S KaretaDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Julien SageDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: julsage@stanford.edu.
Marius WernigDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: wernig@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

The RB pathway in liver cancerR01CA114102 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGE, JULIEN · 2006 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells, defined by an unlimited self-renewal capacity and an undifferentiated state, are best typified by embryonic stem cells. These cells have a unique cell cycle compared to somatic cells as defined by a rapid progression through the cell cycle and a minimal time spent in G1. Recent reports indicate that pluripotency and cell cycle regulation are mechanistically linked. In this review, we discuss the reciprocal co-regulation of these processes, how this co-regulation may prevent differentiation, and how cellular reprogramming can re-establish the unique cell cycle regulation in induced pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansPluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID26520682
PMCPMC4852861
OpenAlexW2193724823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.