Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520646›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: age-stratified cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy.

William B Smith, Joni Steinberg, Stefan Scholtes, Iain R Mcnamara

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04574570 (Clinical Evaluations of the TOKA Customized Device for High Tibial Osteotomy in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04574570 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluations of the TOKA Customized Device for High Tibial Osteotomy in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsor3D Metal Printing LtdRan2020 to 2023Enrolled25ConditionsUnicompartmental Medial Knee OsteoarthritisArmsHigh Tibial Osteotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolving Strategies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review of Integrated Rehabilitation, Pharmacologic, and Joint-Preserving Interventions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William B SmithUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joni SteinbergTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Stefan ScholtesUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Iain R McnamaraNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of East Anglia, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 2UY, UK. imcnamara@doctors.org.uk.
Tulane University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the age-based cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (MCOA).

methodsA Markov model was used to simulate theoretical cohorts of patients 40, 50, 60, and 70 years of age undergoing primary TKA, UKA, or HTO. Costs and outcomes associated with initial and subsequent interventions were estimated by following these virtual cohorts over a 10-year period. Revision and mortality rates, costs, and functional outcome data were estimated from a systematic review of the literature. Probabilistic analysis was conducted to accommodate these parameters' inherent uncertainty, and both discrete and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were utilized to assess the robustness of the model's outputs to changes in key variables.

resultsHTO was most likely to be cost-effective in cohorts under 60, and UKA most likely in those 60 and over. Probabilistic results did not indicate one intervention to be significantly more cost-effective than another. The model was exquisitely sensitive to changes in utility (functional outcome), somewhat sensitive to changes in cost, and least sensitive to changes in 10-year revision risk.

conclusionsHTO may be the most cost-effective option when treating MCOA in younger patients, while UKA may be preferred in older patients. Functional utility is the primary driver of the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. For the clinician, this study supports HTO as a competitive treatment option in young patient populations. It also validates each one of the three interventions considered as potentially optimal, depending heavily on patient preferences and functional utility derived over time.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansKnee JointMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyTibiaTreatment OutcomeCost-effectivenessHigh tibial osteotomyMedial compartment osteoarthritisOsteoarthritisTotal knee arthroplastyUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID26520646
OpenAlexW1904153241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.