Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520402›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2015

Predictive validity of two process-of-care quality measures for residential substance use disorder treatment.

Alex H S Harris, Shalini Gupta, Thomas Bowe, Laura S Ellerbe, Tyler E Phelps, Anna D Rubinsky, John W Finney, Steven M Asch, Keith Humphreys, Jodie Trafton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rural Clients' Continuity Into Follow-Up Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Impacts of Travel Time, Incentives, and Alerts.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex H S HarrisCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Alexander.Harris2@va.gov.
Shalini GuptaCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Shalini.Gupta2@va.gov.
Thomas BoweCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Thomas.Bowe@va.gov.
Laura S EllerbeCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Laura.Ellerbe@va.gov.
Tyler E PhelpsCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Tyler.Phelps@va.gov.
Anna D RubinskyCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Anna.Rubinsky@va.gov.
John W FinneyCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. John.Finney@va.gov A.
Steven M AschCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Steven.Asch@va.gov.
Keith HumphreysCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Keith.Humphreys@va.gov.
Jodie TraftonCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Jodie.Trafton@va.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to monitor and ultimately improve the quality of addiction treatment, professional societies, health care systems, and addiction treatment programs must establish clinical practice standards and then operationalize these standards into reliable, valid, and feasible quality measures. Before being implemented, quality measures should undergo tests of validity, including predictive validity. Predictive validity refers to the association between process-of-care quality measures and subsequent patient outcomes. This study evaluated the predictive validity of two process quality measures of residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment.

methodsWashington Circle (WC) Continuity of Care quality measure is the proportion of patients having an outpatient SUD treatment encounter within 14 days after discharge from residential SUD treatment. The Early Discharge measure is the proportion of patients admitted to residential SUD treatment who discharged within 1 week of admission. The predictive validity of these process measures was evaluated in US Veterans Health Administration patients for whom utilization-based outcome and 2-year mortality data were available. Propensity score-weighted, mixed effects regression adjusted for pre-index imbalances between patients who did and did not meet the measures' criteria and clustering of patients within facilities.

resultsFor the WC Continuity of Care measure, 76 % of 10,064 patients had a follow-up visit within 14 days of discharge. In propensity score-weighted models, patients who had a follow-up visit had a lower 2-year mortality rate [odds ratio (OR) = 0.77, p = 0.008], but no difference in subsequent detoxification episodes relative to patients without a follow-up visit. For the Early Discharge measure, 9.6 % of 10,176 discharged early and had significantly higher 2-year mortality (OR = 1.49, p < 0.001) and more subsequent detoxification episodes.

conclusionsThese two measures of residential SUD treatment quality have strong associations with 2-year mortality and the Early Discharge measure is also associated with more subsequent detoxification episodes. These results provide initial support for the predictive validity of residential SUD treatment quality measures and represent the first time that any SUD quality measure has been shown to predict subsequent mortality.

Indexed as

AdultContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePropensity ScoreQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsResidential TreatmentSeverity of Illness IndexSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26520402
PMCPMC4672518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.