ArticleBMC biotechnology2015
Enhanced in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human fetal MSCs attached to 3D microcarriers versus harvested from 2D monolayers.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of critical process parameters and quality attributes for bioreactor-based expansion of human MSCs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Enhanced burn wound healing by controlled-release 3D ADMSC-derived exosome-loaded hyaluronan hydrogel.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Poly(ethylene glycol)-Based Hydrogel Microcarriers Alter Secretory Activity of Genetically Modified Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Article
- Understanding the impact of bioactive coating materials for human mesenchymal stromal cells and implications for manufacturing.Biotechnology letters · 2023Article
- Dissecting specific Wnt components governing osteogenic differentiation potential by human periodontal ligament stem cells through interleukin-6.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Current Advances in 3D Dynamic Cell Culture Systems.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Heterogeneity of In Vitro Expanded Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Strategies to Improve Their Therapeutic Actions.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Enhancement Strategies for Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of PLLA-316L Stainless Steel Electromechanical Devices for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Preliminary Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Impact of 3D cell culture on bone regeneration potential of mesenchymal stromal cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Review
- Perfused Platforms to Mimic Bone Microenvironment at the Macro/Milli/Microscale: Pros and Cons.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Influence of Microenvironment on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapeutic Potency: From Planar Culture to Microcarriers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of hMSCs on Biomineralized Collagen.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Large-Scale Expansion of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Tissue engineered bone mimetics to study bone disorders ex vivo: Role of bioinspired materials.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- Manufacturing of primed mesenchymal stromal cells for therapy.Nature biomedical engineering · 2019Review
- Tissue Regeneration of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Porous Gelatin Micro-Carriers by Long-Term DynamicTissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019Article
- Customizable Implant-specific and Tissue-Specific Extracellular Matrix Protein Coatings Fabricated Using Atmospheric Plasma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Silk/Fibroin Microcarriers for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Delivery: Optimization of Cell Seeding by the Design of Experiment.Pharmaceutics · 2018Article
- In-vivo evaluation of subcutaneously implanted cell-loaded apatite microcarriers for osteogenic potency.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are of great interest in bone regenerative medicine due to their osteogenic potential and trophic effects. However, challenges to large-scale production of MSCs can hinder the translation of MSC therapies. 3D Microcarrier (MC)-based MSC culture presents a scalable and cost-effective alternative to conventional methods of expansion in 2D monolayers. Furthermore, biodegradable MCs may allow for MC-bound MSC delivery without enzymatic harvest for selected applications such as bone healing. However, the effects of cell expansion on microcarriers and enzymatic cell harvest on MSC phenotype and osteogenic differential potential are not well understood. In this study, we characterized human fetal MSCs (hfMSCs) after expansion in 3D microcarrier spinner or 2D monolayer cultures. Following expansion, we compared osteogenic differentiation of cultures seeded with 3D MC-harvested, 3D MC-bound and conventional 2D monolayer (MNL)-harvested cells when cultured in osteogenic induction media on collagen-coated plates.
resultsFetal MSCs expanded on both 3D agitated Microcarriers (MC) and 2D Plastic static monolayer (MNL) cultures express high levels of MSC surface markers. MC-harvested hfMSCs displayed higher expression of early osteogenic genes but slower mineralization kinetics compared to MNL-harvested MSCs during osteogenic induction. However, in the comparison between MC-bound and MC-harvested hfMSCs, osteogenic genes were upregulated and mineralization kinetics was accelerated in the former condition. Importantly, 3D MC-bound hfMSCs expressed higher levels of osteogenic genes and displayed either higher or equivalent levels of mineralization, depending on the cell line, compared to the classical monolayer cultures use in the literature (MNL-harvested hfMSCs).
conclusionBeyond the processing and scalability advantages of the microcarrier culture, hfMSCs attached to MCs undergo robust osteogenic differentiation and mineralization compared to enzymatically harvested cells. Thus biodegradable/biocompatible MCs which can potentially be used for cell expansion as well as a scaffold for direct in vivo delivery of cells may have advantages over the current methods of monolayer-expansion and delivery post-harvest for bone regeneration applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.