Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520329›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015

Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

James M Kates, Kathryn H Arehart

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2021
    Article
  4. The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  5. The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James M KatesDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.
Kathryn H ArehartDepartment of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

Funding

Characterizing Variability in Hearing Aid Outcomes Among Older AdultsR01DC012289 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SOUZA, PAMELA E. · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012289NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC012289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper uses mutual information to quantify the relationship between envelope modulation fidelity and perceptual responses. Data from several previous experiments that measured speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality are evaluated for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. A model of the auditory periphery is used to generate envelope signals, and envelope modulation fidelity is calculated using the normalized cross-covariance of the degraded signal envelope with that of a reference signal. Two procedures are used to describe the envelope modulation: (1) modulation within each auditory frequency band and (2) spectro-temporal processing that analyzes the modulation of spectral ripple components fit to successive short-time spectra. The results indicate that low modulation rates provide the highest information for intelligibility, while high modulation rates provide the highest information for speech and music quality. The low-to-mid auditory frequencies are most important for intelligibility, while mid frequencies are most important for speech quality and high frequencies are most important for music quality. Differences between the spectral ripple components used for the spectro-temporal analysis were not significant in five of the six experimental conditions evaluated. The results indicate that different modulation-rate and auditory-frequency weights may be appropriate for indices designed to predict different types of perceptual relationships.

Indexed as

AcousticsAuditory PerceptionMusicSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansJudgmentSound SpectrographyVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID26520329
PMCPMC4627935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.