Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520306›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015

Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Daniel M Rasetshwane, Stephen T Neely

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel M RasetshwaneBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Stephen T NeelyBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

Funding

Research Synergy CoreP30DC004662 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI MOELLER, MARY PAT, MORLEY, BARBARA J · 2001 to 2015
$5.9M
COCHLEAR MECHANICS, WAVE PROPAGATION, AND COMPRESSIONR01DC008318 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI NEELY, STEPHEN T · 2007 to 2024
$5.2M
Restoring Cochlear Signal ProcessingR03DC013982 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI RASETSHWANE, DANIEL M. · 2014 to 2016
$446k
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004662NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC4662NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008318NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC8318NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variability in wideband acoustic reflectance (and absorbance) measurements adversely affects the clinical utility of reflectance for diagnosis of middle-ear disorders. A reflectance standard would encourage consistency across different measurement systems and help identify calibration related issues. Theoretical equations exist for the reflectance of finite-length exponential, conical, and parabolic acoustic horns. Reflectance measurements were repeatedly made in each of these three horn shapes and the results were compared to the corresponding theoretical reflectance. A method is described of adjusting acoustic impedance measurements to compensate for spreading of the wave front that propagates from the small diameter sound port of the probe to the larger diameter of the acoustic cavity. Agreement between measured and theoretical reflectance was less than 1 dB at most frequencies in the range from 0.2 to 10 kHz. Pearson correlation coefficients were greater than 0.95 between measured and theoretical time-domain reflectance within the flare region of the horns. The agreement suggests that the distributed reflectance of acoustic horns may be useful for validating reflectance measurements made in human ear canals; however, refinements to reflectance measurement methods may still be needed.

Indexed as

Acoustic Impedance TestsAcousticsEquipment DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID26520306
PMCPMC4617734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.