Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26520153›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2016

Pediatric Return Appointment Adherence for Child Welfare-Involved Children in Los Angeles California.

Janet U Schneiderman, Caitlin Smith, Janet S Arnold-Clark, Jorge Fuentes, Andrea K Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting no-shows in paediatric orthopaedic clinics.BMJ health & care informatics · 2020
    Article
  2. Qualitative Study of Foster Caregivers' Views on Adherence to Pediatric Appointments.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janet U SchneidermanSchool of Social Work, University of Southern California, 669 West 34th Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0411, USA. juschnei@usc.edu.
Caitlin SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. caitlin.alka.smith@gmail.com.
Janet S Arnold-ClarkKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. JArnold@dhs.lacounty.gov.
Jorge FuentesKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jorgef@usc.edu.
Andrea K KennedySchool of Social Work, University of Southern California, 669 West 34th Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0411, USA. abrinkma@usc.edu.

Funding

CORE--STATISTICAL COREP30HD005798 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ENTWISLE, BARBARA · 1985 to 2004
$6.8M
Preventing Medical Neglect of Children in Child WelfareK01HD057987 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SCHNEIDERMAN, JANET U · 2009 to 2013
$610k
NICHD NIH HHS K01-HD05798NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD057987NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD005798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study of primarily Latino caregivers and Latino child welfare-involved children had the following aims: (1) explore the return appointment adherence patterns at a pediatric medical clinic; and (2) determine the relationship of adherence to return appointments and caregiver, child, and clinic variables.

methodsThe sample consisted of caregivers of child welfare-involved children who were asked to make a pediatric outpatient clinic return appointment (N = 87). Predictors included caregiver demographics, child medical diagnoses and age, and clinic/convenience factors including distance from the clinic to caregiver's home, days until the return appointment, reminder telephone call, Latino provider, and additional specialty appointment. Predictors were examined using χ(2) and t tests of significance.

resultsThirty-nine percent of all caregivers were nonadherent in returning for pediatric appointments. When return appointments were scheduled longer after the initial appointment, caregivers were less likely to bring children back for medical care.

conclusionsThe 39 % missed return appointment rate in this study is higher than other similar pediatric populations. Better coordination between pediatricians and caregivers in partnership with child welfare case workers is needed to ensure consistent follow-up regarding health problems, especially when appointments are not scheduled soon after the initial appointment.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesCaregiversChild WelfarePediatricsAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildDelivery of Health CareFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLos AngelesMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceReminder SystemsChild welfareFoster careLatino caregiversReturn appointment adherence

Identifiers

PMID26520153
PMCPMC4740213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.