Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26519467›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2015

The current state of eukaryotic DNA base damage and repair.

Nicholas C Bauer, Anita H Corbett, Paul W Doetsch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Metabolic Influence ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. DNA Repair in Nucleosomes: Insights from Histone Modifications and Mutants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas C BauerDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Cell, and Developmental Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Anita H CorbettDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA acorbe2@emory.edu.
Paul W DoetschDepartment of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA medpwd@emory.edu.
Emory University · US

Funding

Resistance to UV Damage: Role of Gene RegulationP01ES011163 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAMBETH, JOHN DAVID · 2002 to 2012
$12.6M
DNA damage-induced regulation of base excision repair by dynamic localizationF31CA168272 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BAUER, NICHOLAS CHRISTOPHER · 2012 to 2013
$62k
NCI NIH HHS F31CA168272NIEHS NIH HHS P01ES011163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage is a natural hazard of life. The most common DNA lesions are base, sugar, and single-strand break damage resulting from oxidation, alkylation, deamination, and spontaneous hydrolysis. If left unrepaired, such lesions can become fixed in the genome as permanent mutations. Thus, evolution has led to the creation of several highly conserved, partially redundant pathways to repair or mitigate the effects of DNA base damage. The biochemical mechanisms of these pathways have been well characterized and the impact of this work was recently highlighted by the selection of Tomas Lindahl, Aziz Sancar and Paul Modrich as the recipients of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their seminal work in defining DNA repair pathways. However, how these repair pathways are regulated and interconnected is still being elucidated. This review focuses on the classical base excision repair and strand incision pathways in eukaryotes, considering both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans, and extends to some important questions and challenges facing the field of DNA base damage repair.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA Repair EnzymesHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA Repair Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID26519467
PMCPMC4666366
OpenAlexW2143359893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.