Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26519345›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2015

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: subgroup analysis of the MEAD study.

Albert J Augustin, Baruch D Kuppermann, Paolo Lanzetta, Anat Loewenstein, Xiao-Yan Li, Harry Cui, Yehia Hashad, Scott M Whitcup, Ozurdex MEAD Study Group

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00168337 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2005 to 2012Enrolled554ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsDexamethasone, Sham
NCT00168389 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2005 to 2012Enrolled494ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsDexamethasone, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Trial
  4. A multicenter, 12-month randomized study comparing dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Albert J AugustinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestrasse 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany. albertjaugustin@googlemail.com.
Baruch D KuppermannGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. bdkupper@uci.edu.
Paolo LanzettaDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. paolo.lanzetta@uniud.it.
Anat LoewensteinTel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. anatl@tlvmc.gov.il.
Xiao-Yan LiAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA. Li_Joanne@allergan.com.
Harry CuiAvanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA. harrycui2000@gmail.com.
Yehia HashadAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA. Hashad_Yehia@allergan.com.
Scott M WhitcupJules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. scott.whitcup@gmail.com.
Ozurdex MEAD Study Group
Allergan (Ireland) · IEUniversity of Udine · ITAvanir Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USDoheny Eye Institute · USStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DETel Aviv University · ILUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX 0.7) was approved for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) after demonstration of its efficacy and safety in the MEAD registration trials. We performed subgroup analysis of MEAD study results to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEX 0.7 treatment in patients with previously treated DME.

methodsThree-year, randomized, sham-controlled phase 3 study in patients with DME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 34-68 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (20/200-20/50 Snellen equivalent), and central retinal thickness (CRT) ≥ 300 μm measured by time-domain optical coherence tomography. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 doses of DEX (0.7 mg or 0.35 mg), or to sham procedure, with retreatment no more than every 6 months. The primary endpoint was ≥ 15-letter gain in BCVA at study end. Average change in BCVA and CRT from baseline during the study (area-under-the-curve approach) and adverse events were also evaluated. The present subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients randomized to DEX 0.7 (marketed dose) or sham based on prior treatment for DME at study entry.

resultsBaseline characteristics of previously treated DEX 0.7 (n = 247) and sham (n = 261) patients were similar. In the previously treated subgroup, mean number of treatments over 3 years was 4.1 for DEX 0.7 and 3.2 for sham, 21.5% of DEX 0.7 patients versus 11.1 % of sham had ≥ 15-letter BCVA gain from baseline at study end (P = 0.002), mean average BCVA change from baseline was +3.2 letters with DEX 0.7 versus +1.5 letters with sham (P = 0.024), and mean average CRT change from baseline was -126.1 μm with DEX 0.7 versus -39.0 μm with sham (P <  .001). Cataract-related adverse events were reported in 70.3% of baseline phakic patients in the previously treated DEX 0.7 subgroup; vision gains were restored following cataract surgery.

conclusionsDEX 0.7 significantly improved visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with DME previously treated with laser, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, or a combination of these therapies. The safety profile of DEX 0.7 in previously treated patients was similar to its safety profile in the total study population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00168337 and NCT00168389, registered 12 September 2005.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneDiabetic RetinopathyDrug ImplantsFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRetreatmentTomography, Optical CoherenceTriamcinolone AcetonideAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsTriamcinolone AcetonideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26519345
PMCPMC4628378
OpenAlexW1961730097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.