Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2015
Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: subgroup analysis of the MEAD study.
Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the effect of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema.BMC ophthalmology · 2018Pooled it
- Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Trial
- A multicenter, 12-month randomized study comparing dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017Trial
- Hydrogel-based delivery of MSCs and derivatives for improved diabetic retinopathy therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Early Switch to Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Poorly Responding to Anti-VEGF Therapy: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema-A Swiss Cohort Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular edema: biological impact, therapeutic effects, and safety.International ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Intravitreal DEX Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review of National Consensus.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Association of trabecular meshwork height with steroid-induced ocular hypertension.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Intravitreal Ranibizumab Efficacy in Younger Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Beyoglu eye journal · 2023Article
- Long term therapeutic effects of icariin-loaded PLGA microspheres in an experimental model of optic nerve ischemia via modulation of CEBP-β/G-CSF/noncanonical NF-κB axis.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Article
- Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema and Uveitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Place of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the treatment armamentarium of diabetic macular edema.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
- Effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for refractory and treatment-naive diabetic macular edema in Taiwanese patients.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Initial Ten Years of Experience with the Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: A Retrospective Chart Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- The Efficacy of Single-Dose Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Anti-VEGF Therapy: Real-Life Results.Beyoglu eye journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX 0.7) was approved for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) after demonstration of its efficacy and safety in the MEAD registration trials. We performed subgroup analysis of MEAD study results to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEX 0.7 treatment in patients with previously treated DME.
methodsThree-year, randomized, sham-controlled phase 3 study in patients with DME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 34-68 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (20/200-20/50 Snellen equivalent), and central retinal thickness (CRT) ≥ 300 μm measured by time-domain optical coherence tomography. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 doses of DEX (0.7 mg or 0.35 mg), or to sham procedure, with retreatment no more than every 6 months. The primary endpoint was ≥ 15-letter gain in BCVA at study end. Average change in BCVA and CRT from baseline during the study (area-under-the-curve approach) and adverse events were also evaluated. The present subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes in patients randomized to DEX 0.7 (marketed dose) or sham based on prior treatment for DME at study entry.
resultsBaseline characteristics of previously treated DEX 0.7 (n = 247) and sham (n = 261) patients were similar. In the previously treated subgroup, mean number of treatments over 3 years was 4.1 for DEX 0.7 and 3.2 for sham, 21.5% of DEX 0.7 patients versus 11.1 % of sham had ≥ 15-letter BCVA gain from baseline at study end (P = 0.002), mean average BCVA change from baseline was +3.2 letters with DEX 0.7 versus +1.5 letters with sham (P = 0.024), and mean average CRT change from baseline was -126.1 μm with DEX 0.7 versus -39.0 μm with sham (P < .001). Cataract-related adverse events were reported in 70.3% of baseline phakic patients in the previously treated DEX 0.7 subgroup; vision gains were restored following cataract surgery.
conclusionsDEX 0.7 significantly improved visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with DME previously treated with laser, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, or a combination of these therapies. The safety profile of DEX 0.7 in previously treated patients was similar to its safety profile in the total study population.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00168337 and NCT00168389, registered 12 September 2005.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.