Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26519187›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.

Kristina Harris, Christopher R Lim, Jill Dawson, Ray Fitzpatrick, David J Beard, Andrew J Price

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford Knee Scores questions in a multicentric validation study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina HarrisOxford University, Oxford, Australia.
Christopher R LimOxford University, Oxford, Australia. christopher.lim@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-0943
Jill DawsonOxford University, Oxford, Australia.
Ray FitzpatrickOxford University, Oxford, Australia.
David J BeardOxford University, Oxford, Australia.
Andrew J PriceOxford University, Oxford, Australia.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/63/01Health Technology Assessment Programme (GB) 11/63/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we examined whether the OKS demonstrated a floor or a ceiling effect when used to measure the outcome of knee replacement surgery in a large national cohort.

methodsNHS PROMs database, containing pre- to 6 month post-operative OKS on 72,154 patients, mean age 69 (SD 9.4), undergoing knee replacement surgery, was examined to establish the proportion of patients achieving top or bottom OKS values pre- and post-operatively.

resultsPre-operatively, none of patients achieved the maximum/'best' (48) and minimum (0) scores. Post-operatively, no patients (0 %) achieved the minimum/'worst' score, but the percentage achieving the maximum score increased to 2.7 %. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the highest post-operative overall ceiling percentage was 3 %, in a subgroup of patients between 60 and 79 years of age and 13.7 % in a group of patients who had a pre-operative OKS above 41. Furthermore, 10.8 % of patients achieved the top post-operative OKS-PCS and 4.7 % top post-operative OKS-FCS.

conclusionBased on NHS PROMs data, the OKS does not exhibit a ceiling or floor effect overall, or for both its pain and function subscales, and remains a valid measure of outcomes for patients undergoing TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Large-scale retrospective observations study, Level II.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesState MedicineUnited KingdomArthroplastyCeilingFloorFunctionKneeOKSOutcomeOxfordPainPatientReportedScoreSubscale

Identifiers

PMID26519187
OpenAlexW1943924423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.